INTRODUCTION: A recent report described a possible interaction between tenofovir (TFV) and efavirenz (EFV). Patients developed neuropsychiatric manifestations upon introduction of TFV on a stable EFV-containing regimen. We evaluated the possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction between TFV and EFV by assessing cross-sectional and longitudinal data in 169 individuals receiving EFV. RESULTS: EFV plasma area-under-the-curve (AUC) levels were comparable among individuals receiving (n=18) or not receiving TFV (n=151); 57,962 versus 52,293 ng*h/ml. However, under conditions of limited EFV metabolism, that is, the group of 23 individuals carrying two copies of CYP2B6 loss/diminished-function alleles, plasma AUC values were highest among individuals receiving TFV (n=5, 353,031 ng*h/ml), compared with those not receiving TFV (n=18, 180,689 ng*h/ml). Statistical analysis identified both a global, sixfold effect of CYP2B6 loss/diminished function (P < 0.0001) and a significant interaction between the number of loss/diminished-function alleles and the co-medication with TFV (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Although there is no clear evidence for a pharmacokinetic interaction between TFV and EFV, we cannot rule out an interaction between these drugs restricted to individuals who are slow EFV metabolizers.
INTRODUCTION: A recent report described a possible interaction between tenofovir (TFV) and efavirenz (EFV). Patients developed neuropsychiatric manifestations upon introduction of TFV on a stable EFV-containing regimen. We evaluated the possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction between TFV and EFV by assessing cross-sectional and longitudinal data in 169 individuals receiving EFV. RESULTS:EFV plasma area-under-the-curve (AUC) levels were comparable among individuals receiving (n=18) or not receiving TFV (n=151); 57,962 versus 52,293 ng*h/ml. However, under conditions of limited EFV metabolism, that is, the group of 23 individuals carrying two copies of CYP2B6 loss/diminished-function alleles, plasma AUC values were highest among individuals receiving TFV (n=5, 353,031 ng*h/ml), compared with those not receiving TFV (n=18, 180,689 ng*h/ml). Statistical analysis identified both a global, sixfold effect of CYP2B6 loss/diminished function (P < 0.0001) and a significant interaction between the number of loss/diminished-function alleles and the co-medication with TFV (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Although there is no clear evidence for a pharmacokinetic interaction between TFV and EFV, we cannot rule out an interaction between these drugs restricted to individuals who are slow EFV metabolizers.
Authors: Mitzi Glover; Valeria Y Hebert; Krystle Nichols; Stephen Y Xue; Taylor M Thibeaux; James A Zavecz; Tammy R Dugas Journal: Antiviral Res Date: 2014-09-27 Impact factor: 5.970
Authors: Nina Isoherranen; Justin D Lutz; Sophie P Chung; Houda Hachad; Rene H Levy; Isabelle Ragueneau-Majlessi Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Helen Kovari; Caroline A Sabin; Bruno Ledergerber; Lene Ryom; Peter Reiss; Matthew Law; Christian Pradier; Francois Dabis; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Colette Smith; Stephane de Wit; Ole Kirk; Jens D Lundgren; Rainer Weber Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 3.835