BACKGROUND: A cross-sectional content analysis nested within a randomized, controlled trial was conducted to collect information on provider responses to computer alerts regarding guideline recommendations for patients with suboptimal hypertension care. METHODS:Participants were providers who cared for 1,017 patients with uncontrolled hypertension on a single antihypertensive agent within Veterans Affairs primary care clinics. All reasons for action or inaction were sorted into a framework to explain the variation in guideline adaptation. RESULTS: The 184 negative provider responses to computer alerts contained explanations for not changing patient treatment; 76 responses to the alerts were positive, that is, the provider was going to make a change in antihypertensive regimen. The negative responses were categorized as: inertia of practice (66%), lack of agreement with specific guidelines (5%), patient-based factors (17%), environmental factors (10%), and lack of knowledge (2%). Most of the 135 providers classified as inertia of practice indicated, "Continue current medications and I will discuss at the next visit." The median number of days until the next visit was 45 days (interquartile range, 29 to 78 days). DISCUSSION: Clinical inertia was the primary reason for failing to engage in otherwise indicated treatment change in a subgroup of patients. A framework was provided as a taxonomy for classification of provider barriers.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: A cross-sectional content analysis nested within a randomized, controlled trial was conducted to collect information on provider responses to computer alerts regarding guideline recommendations for patients with suboptimal hypertension care. METHODS:Participants were providers who cared for 1,017 patients with uncontrolled hypertension on a single antihypertensive agent within Veterans Affairs primary care clinics. All reasons for action or inaction were sorted into a framework to explain the variation in guideline adaptation. RESULTS: The 184 negative provider responses to computer alerts contained explanations for not changing patient treatment; 76 responses to the alerts were positive, that is, the provider was going to make a change in antihypertensive regimen. The negative responses were categorized as: inertia of practice (66%), lack of agreement with specific guidelines (5%), patient-based factors (17%), environmental factors (10%), and lack of knowledge (2%). Most of the 135 providers classified as inertia of practice indicated, "Continue current medications and I will discuss at the next visit." The median number of days until the next visit was 45 days (interquartile range, 29 to 78 days). DISCUSSION: Clinical inertia was the primary reason for failing to engage in otherwise indicated treatment change in a subgroup of patients. A framework was provided as a taxonomy for classification of provider barriers.
Authors: Annette Moxey; Jane Robertson; David Newby; Isla Hains; Margaret Williamson; Sallie-Anne Pearson Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Adam J Rose; Mark E Glickman; Meredith M D'Amore; Michelle B Orner; Dan Berlowitz; Nancy R Kressin Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Nathaniel A Sowa; Philip Jeng; Amy M Bauer; Joseph M Cerimele; Jürgen Unützer; Yuhua Bao; Lydia Chwastiak Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Stewart B Harris; Hertzel C Gerstein; Jean-François Yale; Lori Berard; John Stewart; Susan Webster-Bogaert; Jordan W Tompkins Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Rasheeda K Hall; Sarah Morton; Jonathan Wilson; Patti L Ephraim; L Ebony Boulware; Wendy L St Peter; Cathleen Colón-Emeric; Jane Pendergast; Julia J Scialla Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2021-06-19 Impact factor: 2.585
Authors: Tom Marshall; Michael Caley; Karla Hemming; Paramjit Gill; Nicola Gale; Kate Jolly Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 3.295