Literature DB >> 17503597

How flexible is phenotypic plasticity? Developmental windows for trait induction and reversal.

Jason T Hoverman1, Rick A Relyea.   

Abstract

Inducible defenses allow prey to modulate their phenotypic responses to the level of predation risk in the environment and reduce the cost of constitutive defenses. Inherent in this statement is that prey must alter their phenotypes during development in order to form these defenses. This has lead many ecologists and evolutionary biologists to call for studies that examine developmental plasticity to provide insights into the importance of development in controlling the trajectories of trait formation, the integration of phenotypes over ontogeny, and the establishment of developmental windows for trait formation and reversal. By moving away from studies that focus on a single point in development, we can obtain a more complete understanding of the phenotypic decisions and limitations of prey. We exposed freshwater snails (Helisoma trivolvis) to environments in which predatory water bugs (Belostoma flumineum) were always absent, always present, or added and removed at different points in development. We discovered that snails formed morphological defenses against water bugs. Importantly, after the initial induction of defenses, snails showed similar developmental trajectories as snails reared without predators. Further, the snails possessed wide developmental windows for inducible defenses that extended past sexual maturity. However, being induced later in development appeared to have an associated cost (i.e., decreased shell thickness) that was not found when water bugs were always present. This epiphenotype (i.e., new shell formation as an extension of the current shell) suggests that resource limitation plays an important role in responses to temporal variation in predation risk and may have critical ecological costs that limit the benefits of the inducible defense. Lastly, the ability of snails to completely reverse their defenses was limited to early in ontogeny due to the constraints associated with modular growth of shell material. In sum, we demonstrate that taking a developmental perspective is extremely valuable for understanding the ecology of inducible defenses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17503597     DOI: 10.1890/05-1697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  22 in total

Review 1.  What can aquatic gastropods tell us about phenotypic plasticity? A review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  P E Bourdeau; R K Butlin; C Brönmark; T C Edgell; J T Hoverman; J Hollander
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Developmental Stage Affects the Consequences of Transient Salinity Exposure in Toad Tadpoles.

Authors:  Allison M Welch; Jordan P Bralley; Ashlyn Q Reining; Allison M Infante
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.326

3.  The rules of engagement: how to defend against combinations of predators.

Authors:  Jason T Hoverman; Rick A Relyea
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Plasticity comparisons between plants and animals: Concepts and mechanisms.

Authors:  Renee M Borges
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2008-06

5.  Life history as a constraint on plasticity: developmental timing is correlated with phenotypic variation in birds.

Authors:  E C Snell-Rood; E M Swanson; R L Young
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Phenotypically plastic responses to predation risk are temperature dependent.

Authors:  Thomas M Luhring; Janna M Vavra; Clayton E Cressler; John P DeLong
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Differential limb loading in miniature pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus): a test of chondral modeling theory.

Authors:  Kimberly A Congdon; Ashley S Hammond; Matthew J Ravosa
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  The effect of aquatic plant abundance on shell crushing resistance in a freshwater snail.

Authors:  Johel Chaves-Campos; Lyndon M Coghill; Francisco J García de León; Steven G Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Compensatory development and costs of plasticity: larval responses to desiccated conspecifics.

Authors:  Asaf Sadeh; Noa Truskanov; Marc Mangel; Leon Blaustein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Predator-induced morphological plasticity across local populations of a freshwater snail.

Authors:  Christer Brönmark; Thomas Lakowitz; Johan Hollander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.