Literature DB >> 17503587

Can we measure carrying capacity with foraging behavior?

Douglas W Morris1, Shomen Mukherjee.   

Abstract

Carrying capacity is one of the most important, yet least understood and rarely estimated, parameters in population management and modeling. A simple behavioral metric of carrying capacity would advance theory, conservation, and management of biological populations. Such a metric should be possible because behavior is finely attuned to variation in environment including population density. We connect optimal foraging theory with population dynamics and life history to develop a simple model that predicts this sort of adaptive density-dependent change in food consumption. We then confirm the model's unexpected and manifold predictions with field experiments. The theory predicts reproductive thresholds that alter the marginal value of energy as well as the value of time. Both effects cause a pronounced discontinuity in quitting-harvest rate that we revealed with foraging experiments. Red-backed voles maintained across a range of high densities foraged at a lower density-dependent rate than the same animals exposed to low-density treatments. The change in harvest rate is diagnostic of populations that exceed their carrying capacity. Ecologists, conservation biologists, and wildlife managers may thus be able to use simple and efficient foraging experiments to estimate carrying capacity and habitat quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17503587     DOI: 10.1890/06-0389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  5 in total

1.  Reversed optimality and predictive ecology: burrowing depth forecasts population change in a bivalve.

Authors:  Jan A van Gils; Casper Kraan; Anne Dekinga; Anita Koolhaas; Jan Drent; Petra de Goeij; Theunis Piersma
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  An island-wide predator manipulation reveals immediate and long-lasting matching of risk by prey.

Authors:  John L Orrock; Robert J Fletcher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Determination of foraging thresholds and effects of application on energetic carrying capacity for waterfowl.

Authors:  Heath M Hagy; Richard M Kaminski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Thermal carrying capacity for a thermally-sensitive species at the warmest edge of its range.

Authors:  Daniel Ayllón; Graciela G Nicola; Benigno Elvira; Irene Parra; Ana Almodóvar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Bust economics: foragers choose high quality habitats in lean times.

Authors:  Sonny S Bleicher; Christopher R Dickman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.