Literature DB >> 17502978

The impact of process variables on the removal of PBDEs and NPEOs during simulated activated sludge treatment.

Katherine Langford1, Mark Scrimshaw, John Lester.   

Abstract

This work illustrates that the removal of some endocrine-disrupting compounds from sewage treatment works effluent is dependent on parameters such as sludge age, influent concentrations, concentrations of co-pollutants and hydraulic retention time as well as physicochemical properties of the compound. Greater nonylphenol polyethoxylates (NPEO) and polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) removal was observed at a higher sludge age, and it appeared that the enzymes required for NPEO degradation were already present. NPEO degradation was reduced in the presence of the more hydrophobic PBDE compounds as sorption of PBDEs occurred, rapidly reducing available sorption sites for NPEOs. The more hydrophobic NP and PBDEs demonstrated little degradation in comparison to longer-chain NPEO compounds. From this research, it is apparent that the principal environmental risk of PBDE contamination after wastewater treatment is via sludge-disposal routes. Treatment of wastewater containing NPEO surfactants poses environmental risks via two routes: some nonylphenolic compounds may pass through into receiving waters and degradation products such as nonylphenol and short-chain ethoxylate compounds will enter the environment via sludge disposal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17502978     DOI: 10.1007/s00244-006-0052-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  7 in total

1.  The fate of steroid estrogens: partitioning during wastewater treatment and onto river sediments.

Authors:  Rachel L Gomes; Mark D Scrimshaw; Elise Cartmell; John N Lester
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Occurrence of phthalates in aquatic environment and their removal during wastewater treatment processes: a review.

Authors:  Khalid Muzamil Gani; Vinay Kumar Tyagi; Absar Ahmad Kazmi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Biofiltration vs conventional activated sludge plants: what about priority and emerging pollutants removal?

Authors:  R Mailler; J Gasperi; V Rocher; S Gilbert-Pawlik; D Geara-Matta; R Moilleron; G Chebbo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Effects of the joint exposure of decabromodiphenyl ether and tetrabromobisphenol A on soil bacterial community structure.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Lei Chen; Shuai An; Kou Liu; Kuangfei Lin; Rongbing Fu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Toxicity responses of bacterial community as a biological indicator after repeated exposure to lead (Pb) in the presence of decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE209).

Authors:  Bo Liu; Rong Zhang; Xiaoqian Xia; Wei Zhang; Mengwen Gao; Qiang Lu; Kuangfei Lin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Occurrence and Risk Assessment of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers in Surface Water and Sediment of Nahoon River Estuary, South Africa.

Authors:  Chinemerem Ruth Ohoro; Abiodun Olagoke Adeniji; Lucy Semerjian; Anthony Ifeanyi Okoh; Omobola Oluranti Okoh
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Association of brominated flame retardants with diabetes and metabolic syndrome in the U.S. population, 2003-2004.

Authors:  Ji-Sun Lim; Duk-Hee Lee; David R Jacobs
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 19.112

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.