Literature DB >> 17502878

Validation of the walking index for spinal cord injury in a US and European clinical population.

J F Ditunno1, G Scivoletto, M Patrick, F Biering-Sorensen, R Abel, R Marino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the prospective construct validity of the walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI) in US/European clinical population.
DESIGN: Prospective Cohort in Denmark, Germany, Italy and the USA. PARTICIPANTS/
METHOD: Participants with acute complete/incomplete (ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) A, B, C and D) traumatic spinal cord injuries were enrolled from four centers. Lower extremity motor scores (LEMS), WISCI level and Locomotor Functional Independence Measure (LFIM) levels were assessed with change in ambulatory status. WISCI progression was assessed for monotonic direction of improvement (MDI). LEMS were correlated to WISCI/LFIM. Use of walking aids/braces were analyzed.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy participants were enrolled and 20 excluded. Of the 150 participants (USA 112/150; Europe 38/150) (AIS A=59, B=19, C=32, D=40), LEMS and WISCI assessments were performed initially and at final assessment (3-12 months post injury) or until maximum WISCI score of 20. Eighty-five percent of motor complete (66/78) and 10% (7/72) of motor incomplete participants showed no progression (73/150). Of the remaining participants (77/150) who improved, 81% (62/77) showed MDI. However, the deviation from MDI occurred only at one time-point in 10/15 participants. LEMS correlated with WISCI at initial and final assessment (0.47 and 0.91 P<0.001). Parallel bar use differed between the US and Europe possibly due to patterns of care. Use of braces also differed.
CONCLUSION: The results support the hierarchical ranking of the WISCI scale and the correlation of WISCI levels to impairment (LEMS) in a clinical setting of four nations. Differences in practice between the US and Europe need consideration in design of trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17502878     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  10 in total

1.  Using a logarithmic model to predict functional independence after spinal cord injury: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yohei Tomioka; Osamu Uemura; Ryota Ishii; Meigen Liu
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Development of the AOSpine Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma (AOSpine PROST): a universal disease-specific outcome instrument for individuals with traumatic spinal column injury.

Authors:  Said Sadiqi; A Mechteld Lehr; Marcel W Post; Marcel F Dvorak; Frank Kandziora; S Rajasekaran; Klaus J Schnake; Alexander R Vaccaro; F Cumhur Oner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Assessment of disability in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; Vanessa Noonan; Anoushka Singh; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Concurrent validity of single and groups of walking assessments following acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  A Aigner; A Curt; L G Tanadini; M H Maathuis
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Validity and reliability of the 2-minute walk test in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Romina Willi; Mario Widmer; Nora Merz; Caroline H G Bastiaenen; Björn Zörner; Marc Bolliger
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 2.473

Review 6.  Assessment of impairment in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; Vanessa Noonan; Anoushka Singh; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Ambulation following spinal cord injury and its correlates.

Authors:  Nitin Menon; Anupam Gupta; Meeka Khanna; Arun B Taly
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.383

Review 8.  Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Giorgio Scivoletto; Federica Tamburella; Letizia Laurenza; Monica Torre; Marco Molinari
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Lower extremity outcome measures: considerations for clinical trials in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Marc Bolliger; Andrew R Blight; Edelle C Field-Fote; Kristin Musselman; Serge Rossignol; Dorothy Barthélemy; Laurent Bouyer; Milos R Popovic; Jan M Schwab; Michael L Boninger; Keith E Tansey; Giorgio Scivoletto; Naomi Kleitman; Linda A T Jones; Dany H Gagnon; Sylvie Nadeau; Dirk Haupt; Lea Awai; Chris S Easthope; Björn Zörner; Ruediger Rupp; Dan Lammertse; Armin Curt; John Steeves
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.772

10.  Quality of residual neuromuscular control and functional deficits in patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Alexander V Ovechkin; Todd W Vitaz; Daniela G L Terson de Paleville; William B McKay
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.003

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.