Literature DB >> 17502746

Experimentally increased intraocular pressure using digital forces.

Charles W McMonnies1, Gavin C Boneham.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the reliability of an experimental method for increasing intraocular pressure (IOP) that could be used during videokeratography.
METHODS: Two levels of digital force ("light" and "firm") were applied by each subject to the temporal sclera of the right eye through the adnexal skin. Noncontact tonometry was used to record IOP increments obtained for samples of 15 measurements with each level of digital force. The subject was advised of the IOP recorded after each measurement. Because "with-result-feedback" increments in IOP would not be possible during videokeratography, a second, "without-result-feedback" series was recorded 3 minutes later to examine the reliability of the induced IOP increments. The authors alternated the roles of subject and examiner.
RESULTS: The mean normal readings were 19.4 mm Hg (C.W.M.) and 11.7 mm Hg (G.C.B.). The mean IOPs recorded under with-result-feedback conditions for light and firm digital forces were 27.2 mm Hg and 58.3 mm Hg (C.W.M.) and 27.1 mm Hg and 52.1 mm Hg (G.C.B.), respectively. Coincidentally, light digital forces were found to induce IOP increments for G.C.B. that were similar to those that would be expected to occur during 5.5 g weighted Schiotz tonometry. The 95% confidence limits for IOP increments under with-result-feedback conditions for light and firm digital forces were 33% to 47% and 187% to 215% (C.W.M.) and 116% to 146% and 303% to 388% (G.C.B.), respectively. The means of the without-result-feedback IOP increments for the two levels of digital force, and for each subject, all fell within these 95% confidence limits.
CONCLUSIONS: For trained subjects, digital forces on the eye appear to allow an examination of the influence of IOP increments on anterior corneal surface curvature. The mean IOP increments for the two levels of digital force (+40% and +200% [C.W.M.] and +132% and +345% [G.C.B.]) appear to permit videokeratography at higher IOP levels and across a wider range than those previously examined in vivo.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17502746     DOI: 10.1097/01.icl.0000247637.71618.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye Contact Lens        ISSN: 1542-2321            Impact factor:   2.018


  4 in total

Review 1.  An examination of the hypothesis that intraocular pressure elevation episodes can have prognostic significance in glaucoma suspects.

Authors:  Charles McMonnies
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-09-04

2.  Effects of Scleral Contact Lenses for Keratoconus Management on Visual Quality and Intraocular Pressure.

Authors:  Martina Formisano; Federica Franzone; Ludovico Alisi; Santino Pistella; Leopoldo Spadea
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 3.  How Can We Best Measure the Performance of Scleral Lenses? Current Insights.

Authors:  Rute J Macedo-de-Araújo; Daddi Fadel; Melissa Barnett
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2022-04-07

4.  Comparison of Pneumatonometry and Transpalpebral Tonometry Measurements of Intraocular Pressure during Scleral Lens Wear.

Authors:  Jennifer Swingle Fogt; Cherie B Nau; Muriel Schornack; Ellen Shorter; Amy Nau; Jennifer S Harthan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.106

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.