R T Wakai1, W J Lutter, M Chen, M M Maier. 1. Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. rtwakai@wisc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To follow the development of the auditory evoked on- and off-responses in early infancy. METHODS: The subjects were healthy infants, studied at conceptional age (CA) 39-66 weeks. Serial auditory evoked responses (AERs) were recorded in 17 subjects in response to tones of frequency 1.5 kHz and duration 1.0 s in order to follow the development of the AERs. Two small substudies were performed to examine off-responses evoked by tones of varying duration. The first used 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5s tones; the second used 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 s tones. RESULTS: For the 1.0 s tones, the on- and off-responses consisted of three components: P250, P400, and N750 m. The on- and off-responses had similar amplitude, in contrast to adult AERs in which the on-responses are typically much larger. Prior to about CA 47 weeks, the on-responses were actually smaller on average than the off-responses, and in infants born prior to CA 38 weeks the AERs were dominated by the off-response. Off-responses were seen for tones as brief as 0.2 s; however, the P400m component was often absent in the off-responses for tone durations < or = 0.5 s. An interaction was observed in which the N750 m-On component was strongly suppressed when it overlapped the P250 m-Off. CONCLUSIONS: Off-responses are much more prominent in infant than in adult AERs, especially in pre-term infants and at early CAs. On- and off-responses also exhibit more complex behavior in infants than in adult; the individual components can interact and behave independently. SIGNIFICANCE: Measurement of auditory off-responses can improve the assessment of infant neurodevelopment, potentially providing a marker of brain immaturity.
OBJECTIVE: To follow the development of the auditory evoked on- and off-responses in early infancy. METHODS: The subjects were healthy infants, studied at conceptional age (CA) 39-66 weeks. Serial auditory evoked responses (AERs) were recorded in 17 subjects in response to tones of frequency 1.5 kHz and duration 1.0 s in order to follow the development of the AERs. Two small substudies were performed to examine off-responses evoked by tones of varying duration. The first used 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5s tones; the second used 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 s tones. RESULTS: For the 1.0 s tones, the on- and off-responses consisted of three components: P250, P400, and N750 m. The on- and off-responses had similar amplitude, in contrast to adult AERs in which the on-responses are typically much larger. Prior to about CA 47 weeks, the on-responses were actually smaller on average than the off-responses, and in infants born prior to CA 38 weeks the AERs were dominated by the off-response. Off-responses were seen for tones as brief as 0.2 s; however, the P400m component was often absent in the off-responses for tone durations < or = 0.5 s. An interaction was observed in which the N750 m-On component was strongly suppressed when it overlapped the P250 m-Off. CONCLUSIONS: Off-responses are much more prominent in infant than in adult AERs, especially in pre-term infants and at early CAs. On- and off-responses also exhibit more complex behavior in infants than in adult; the individual components can interact and behave independently. SIGNIFICANCE: Measurement of auditory off-responses can improve the assessment of infant neurodevelopment, potentially providing a marker of brain immaturity.
Authors: K Noda; M Tonoike; K Doi; I Koizuka; M Yamaguchi; R Seo; N Matsumoto; T Noiri; N Takeda; T Kubo Journal: Neuroreport Date: 1998-08-03 Impact factor: 1.837
Authors: Julia M Stephen; Dina E Hill; Amanda Peters; Lucinda Flynn; Tongsheng Zhang; Yoshio Okada Journal: Dev Neurosci Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Jason Hill; Terrie Inder; Jeffrey Neil; Donna Dierker; John Harwell; David Van Essen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-07-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Seok Lew; Danielle D Sliva; Myong-sun Choe; P Ellen Grant; Yoshio Okada; Carsten H Wolters; Matti S Hämäläinen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-03-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: J M Stephen; I Solis; J Janowich; M Stern; M R Frenzel; J A Eastman; M S Mills; C M Embury; N M Coolidge; E Heinrichs-Graham; A Mayer; J Liu; Y P Wang; T W Wilson; V D Calhoun Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Yang Zhang; Bing Cheng; Tess K Koerner; Robert S Schlauch; Keita Tanaka; Masaki Kawakatsu; Iku Nemoto; Toshiaki Imada Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2016-08-05