Literature DB >> 17501709

Effects of a walking program in the psychiatric in-patient treatment setting: a cohort study.

Felicity Ng1, Seetal Dodd, Felice N Jacka, Evie Leslie, Michael Berk.   

Abstract

ISSUE ADDRESSED: To assess the effectiveness of a walking program in a psychiatric in-patient unit.
METHOD: In-patients at a private psychiatric unit were offered the opportunity to participate in a daily morning 40- minute walk led by an activity supervisor. After discharge, outcomes for patients who had regularly participated in the walking group (n=35) and patients who had not participated (n=49) were compared for length of stay during their period of admission and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) scores measured at admission and discharge. This was a retrospective analysis of data collected routinely.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two cohorts on most primary outcome measures, including length of stay, DASS scores at admission and at discharge and CGI-S scores at admission. Patients who had not participated in the walking group had a significantly lower score on a single measure, the CGI-S, than patients who had participated (p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed no evidence that in-patients benefited from participating in the physical activity program. However, this must be interpreted within the confines of a number of study limitations and, as such, the findings can neither support nor refute the effectiveness of physical activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17501709     DOI: 10.1071/he07039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot J Austr        ISSN: 1036-1073


  3 in total

Review 1.  Is there evidence that walking groups have health benefits? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Hanson; Andy Jones
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Associations between physical behaviour patterns and levels of depressive symptoms, anxiety and well-being in middle-aged adults: a cross-sectional study using isotemporal substitution models.

Authors:  Christina B Dillon; Elaine McMahon; Grace O'Regan; Ivan J Perry
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Lifestyle medicine for depression.

Authors:  Jerome Sarris; Adrienne O'Neil; Carolyn E Coulson; Isaac Schweitzer; Michael Berk
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.630

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.