Literature DB >> 17500426

Relationship between nephrologist care and progression of chronic kidney disease.

Lori A Orlando1, William F Owen, David B Matchar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 11% of the United States population, and its incidence is rising, experts recommend early referral to nephrologists in the hope that it may delay the onset of end-stage disease and improve survival. However, limitations in the capacity of currently practicing nephrologists may prevent widespread early referral.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between disease progression and timing of nephrology referral. STUDY DESIGN AND DATA COLLECTION: We retrospectively identified 1,553 veterans at the Durham, North Carolina VA hospital between January 1998 and December 1999 who had CKD, defined as two outpatient serum creatinines > or = 1.4 mg/dL at least three months apart. Our endpoint was a composite of progression to the next CKD stage or death. We compared the time to the composite endpoint for each CKD stage and for early CKD (stages 1-3) to advanced CKD (stages 4 and 5) using a Cox proportional hazards model for two groups: those with primary care only (PCP-only) and those with primary and nephrology care (nephrology).
RESULTS: Ninety-two percent had hypertension, 52% diabetes, 49% coronary artery disease, and 89% proteinuria. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and anti-lipid medications were used by 52% and 39%, respectively. The median number of days spent in each CKD stage and the proportion of each groups reaching the composite endpoint are--stage 1: 1,149 days, 68% of the PCP-only group and 73% of the nephrology group; stage 2: 1,206 days, 60% and 65%; stage 3: 1,158 days, 69% and 63%; and stage 4: 794 days, 86% and 72%. Adjusted survival curves for the composite endpoint were similar between the two groups for CKD stages 1 (HR 1.08 for nephrology versus PCP-only) and 2 (HR 1.20); however for CKD stages 3 (HR 0.80, p < 0.05) and 4 (HR 0.75, p < 0.05), the nephrology group gained 316, 215, and 120 more days of progression-free survival, respectively. LIMITATIONS: The major limitation is difficulty accounting for unmeasured bias in specialty referrals. We were unable to analyze stage 5-to-dialysis due to the small number of individuals with the outcome.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that an appropriate time for nephrology comanagement of patients with CKD may be stage 3; however, prospective studies are needed to clarify the role and timing of nephrology referral.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17500426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N C Med J        ISSN: 0029-2559


  16 in total

1.  Development and validation of an electronic phenotyping algorithm for chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Girish N Nadkarni; Omri Gottesman; James G Linneman; Herbert Chase; Richard L Berg; Samira Farouk; Rajiv Nadukuru; Vaneet Lotay; Steve Ellis; George Hripcsak; Peggy Peissig; Chunhua Weng; Erwin P Bottinger
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

2.  Automated clinical reminders for primary care providers in the care of CKD: a small cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Khaled Abdel-Kader; Gary S Fischer; Jie Li; Charity G Moore; Rachel Hess; Mark L Unruh
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 3.  Social Determinants of Racial Disparities in CKD.

Authors:  Jenna M Norton; Marva M Moxey-Mims; Paul W Eggers; Andrew S Narva; Robert A Star; Paul L Kimmel; Griffin P Rodgers
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 4.  Early detection of CKD: the benefits, limitations and effects on prognosis.

Authors:  Adeera Levin; Paul E Stevens
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 28.314

5.  Influence of Nephrologist Care on Management and Outcomes in Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Ana C Ricardo; Jason A Roy; Kaixiang Tao; Arnold Alper; Jing Chen; Paul E Drawz; Jeffrey C Fink; Chi-Yuan Hsu; John W Kusek; Akinlolu Ojo; Martin Schreiber; Michael J Fischer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Prescription rate of erythropoietin-stimulating agents is low for patients with renal impairment under non-nephrology care in a tertiary-level academic medical center in Japan.

Authors:  Naoki Okamoto; Daijo Inaguma; Hiroki Hayashi; Akira Koseki; Toshiya Iwamori; Michiharu Kudo; Yukio Yuzawa
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.801

7.  Treatment center and geographic variability in pre-ESRD care associate with increased mortality.

Authors:  William M McClellan; Haimanot Wasse; Ann C McClellan; Adam Kipp; Lance A Waller; Michael V Rocco
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  A survey of nephrologists' views on preemptive transplantation.

Authors:  Françoise G Pradel; Rahul Jain; C Daniel Mullins; Joseph A Vassalotti; Stephen T Bartlett
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Effects of proactive population-based nephrologist oversight on progression of chronic kidney disease: a retrospective control analysis.

Authors:  Brian Lee; Marianne Turley; Di Meng; Yvonne Zhou; Terhilda Garrido; Alan Lau; Linda Radler
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Characterizing pre-dialysis care in the era of eGFR reporting: a cohort study.

Authors:  Khaled Abdel-Kader; Gary S Fischer; James R Johnston; Chen Gu; Charity G Moore; Mark L Unruh
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.