Literature DB >> 17500004

A surgeon's case volume of oesophagectomy for cancer strongly influences the operative mortality rate.

Marcello Migliore1, Cliff K Choong, Eric Lim, Kimberley A Goldsmith, Andy Ritchie, Francis C Wells.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess if individual case volume of oesophagectomy for cancer influences the risk of mortality and long-term survival.
METHODS: Between January 1994 and December 2005, 195 resections for oesophageal cancer were performed by nine surgeons in a single institution. Operative mortality, defined as in hospital death, was compared between the high-volume and low-volume surgeons. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for death between the two groups, also in the presence of covariates.
RESULTS: There were 140 males and 55 females with mean age of 63.4 (32-84). Two high-volume surgeons performed 61% (118) of the operations with a mean of 11 per year compared to 4 per year in the low-volume group. The patients in the two groups were matched for age (63 years vs 64; p=0.53), sex (67 vs 79% male; p=0.07). Ivor Lewis resections were performed more frequently by high-volume surgeons (95 vs 73%; p<0.001). The operative mortality rate was much lower when high case volume surgeons performed the procedure (4 vs 17%; p=0.001). The relative risk of death when low-volume surgeons performed the procedure was 4.59 (95% CI 1.57-13.46; p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was significantly associated with low-volume surgeon when controlling separately for age (OR 4.60; 95% CI 1.55, 13.60, p=0.006), tumor stage (OR 3.76; 95% CI 1.24, 11.45, p=0.02) and tumor type (OR 3.87; 95% CI 1.29, 11.60, p=0.016). Kaplan-Meier curves comparing the survival of high- and low-volume surgeons showed no statistical differences (Log rank p=0.48).
CONCLUSIONS: Operative mortality rate for oesophagectomy for cancer is strongly influenced by case volume and was 4.6-fold higher when performed by surgeons with low case volume. Patients with oesophageal cancer in need of an oesophagectomy may benefit from referral to a high-volume thoracic surgeon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17500004     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  14 in total

1.  Outcomes of esophagectomy according to surgeon's training: general vs. thoracic.

Authors:  Brian R Smith; Marcelo W Hinojosa; Kevin M Reavis; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  National trends in esophageal surgery--are outcomes as good as we believe?

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Joseph Anton Galanko; Michael Owen Meyers; Richard Harry Feins; Timothy Michael Farrell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Should esophageal resections for cancer be performed in high-volume centers only?

Authors:  Carlo V Feo; Victoria M Villaflor; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2011-06-22

4.  Does surgeon experience affect outcomes in pathologic stage I lung cancer?

Authors:  Paul J Scheel; Traves D Crabtree; Jennifer M Bell; Christine Frederiksen; Stephen R Broderick; A Sasha Krupnick; Daniel Kreisel; G Alexander Patterson; Bryan F Meyers; Varun Puri
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Endoscopic mucosal resection for gastroesophageal cancer in a U.K. population. Long-term follow-up of a consecutive series.

Authors:  Andrew B C Crumley; James J Going; Kerryanne McEwan; Margaret McKernan; Jo-Etienne Abela; Christopher J Shearer; Adrian J Stanley; Robert C Stuart
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open surgery: is there an advantage?

Authors:  Lesley Uttley; Fiona Campbell; Michael Rhodes; Anna Cantrell; Heather Stegenga; Myfanwy Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hasan F Batirel
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-11-06

8.  Centralization of Pancreatic Surgery in Europe.

Authors:  Adam Polonski; Jakob R Izbicki; Faik G Uzunoglu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Early outcomes of surgery for oesophageal cancer in a thoracic regional unit. Can we maintain training without compromising results?

Authors:  Sumana D M Handagala; Emmanuel Addae-Boateng; David Beggs; John P Duffy; Antonio E Martin-Ucar
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy in a patient with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Mouayyad Zaza; Puja Gaur; Edward Y Chan; Min P Kim
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.