Literature DB >> 17499391

Utility of routine testing for patients with asymptomatic severe blood pressure elevation in the emergency department.

David J Karras1, Linda K Kruus, John J Cienki, Marlena M Wald, Jacob W Ufberg, Philip Shayne, David A Wald, Katherine L Heilpern.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Recommendations for the treatment of emergency department (ED) patients with asymptomatic severely elevated blood pressure advise assessment for occult, acute hypertensive target-organ damage. This study determines the prevalence of unanticipated, clinically meaningful test abnormalities in ED patients with asymptomatic severely elevated blood pressure.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study at 3 urban academic EDs. Consecutive patients with systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 180 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 110 mm Hg on 2 measurements were enrolled if they denied symptoms of hypertensive emergency. A basic metabolic panel, urinalysis, ECG, CBC count, and chest radiograph were obtained. Treating physicians were interviewed about the indication for each test and whether an abnormal result was anticipated according to clinical findings. When test results were available, physicians were asked whether abnormal findings were clinically meaningful, defined as leading to unanticipated hospitalization, medication modification, or further immediate evaluation. The primary outcome was the prevalence of unanticipated clinically meaningful test abnormalities.
RESULTS: One hundred nine patients with asymptomatic severely elevated blood pressure were enrolled. Unanticipated abnormal test results were noted in 57 (52%) patients. Clinically meaningful unanticipated test abnormalities were found in 7 (6%) patients: basic metabolic panel in 2 (2%), CBC count in 3 (3%), urinalysis in 3 (4%), ECG in 2 (2%), and chest radiograph in 1 (1%). Five patients (5%) had abnormalities assessed as possible manifestations of acute hypertensive target-organ injury; none had abnormalities clearly related to severely elevated blood pressure.
CONCLUSION: Screening tests of urban ED patients with asymptomatic severely elevated blood pressure infrequently detect unanticipated hypertension-related abnormalities that alter ED management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17499391     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  5 in total

1.  When More Isn't Better: Visits for Hypertension: Answers to the September 2016 Journal Club Questions.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Goldberg; Phillip D Levy; Candace D McNaughton
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  High-Risk Patients with Hypertension: Clinical Management Options.

Authors:  Candace D McNaughton; Wesley H Self; Phillip D Levy; Tyler W Barrett
Journal:  Clin Med Rev Vasc Health       Date:  2013-10-08

3.  Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

Authors:  James F Meschia; Cheryl Bushnell; Bernadette Boden-Albala; Lynne T Braun; Dawn M Bravata; Seemant Chaturvedi; Mark A Creager; Robert H Eckel; Mitchell S V Elkind; Myriam Fornage; Larry B Goldstein; Steven M Greenberg; Susanna E Horvath; Costantino Iadecola; Edward C Jauch; Wesley S Moore; John A Wilson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Blood Pressure Assessment and Treatment in the Observation Unit.

Authors:  Christina M Vitto; Joseph D Lykins V; Hillary Wiles-Lafayette; Taruna K Aurora
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  Hypertension in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Stewart Siu-Wa Chan; Colin A Graham; T H Rainer
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.369

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.