Literature DB >> 17499284

Finasteride decreases the risk of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Ian M Thompson1, M Scott Lucia, Mary W Redman, Amy Darke, Francisco G La Rosa, Howard L Parnes, Scott M Lippman, Charles A Coltman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is likely a premalignant lesion of the prostate. Decreasing the frequency of high grade PIN may decrease the risk of prostate cancer. In the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial we evaluated the impact of finasteride on the risk of a needle biopsy diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial was a randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial that enrolled 18,882 men without evidence of prostate cancer, prostate specific antigen less than 3.0 ng/ml and normal digital rectal examination, and randomized them to 5 mg finasteride daily or placebo. Subjects were followed for 7 years with biopsy recommended for prostate specific antigen greater than 4.0 ng/ml, adjusted in the finasteride group to achieve an equal number of biopsy recommendations or for abnormal digital rectal examination. All cancer-free subjects were recommended to undergo biopsy after 7 years on study. We evaluated the diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with or without concomitant prostate cancer in these 2 study groups.
RESULTS: The number of men evaluable for high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was 4,568 in the finasteride group and 4,886 in the placebo group. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia alone was diagnosed in 276 men (6.0%) in the finasteride group vs 347 (7.1%) in the placebo group (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.99, p=0.04). High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia accompanied by prostate cancer was diagnosed in 144 men (3.2%) in the finasteride group vs 223 (4.6%) in the placebo group (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.85, p=0.0004). Finasteride significantly decreased the overall risk of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (alone and with cancer) from 570 cases (11.7%) in the placebo group to 420 (9.2%) in the finasteride group (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.89, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Finasteride significantly decreased the risk of high grade PIN. This observation may explain how finasteride decreased prostate cancer in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, supporting the notion that high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a premalignant lesion of the prostate, and it provides new information relevant to the consideration of finasteride for prostate cancer prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17499284     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  12 in total

Review 1.  Molecular targets for cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  William N William; John V Heymach; Edward S Kim; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Prevention of prostate cancer: outcomes of clinical trials and future opportunities.

Authors:  Ian Thompson; Alan Kristal; Elizabeth A Platz
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2014

3.  [Risks and prevention of prostate cancer. Commentary on the new S3 guideline].

Authors:  B J Schmitz-Dräger; E Bismarck; G Lümmen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  [Secondary and tertiary prevention of urological tumors].

Authors:  B J Schmitz-Dräger; G Lümmen; E Bismarck; C Fischer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Phase III trial of selenium to prevent prostate cancer in men with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: SWOG S9917.

Authors:  James R Marshall; Catherine M Tangen; Wael A Sakr; David P Wood; Donna L Berry; Eric A Klein; Scott M Lippman; Howard L Parnes; David S Alberts; David F Jarrard; W Robert Lee; J Michael Gaziano; E David Crawford; Benjamin Ely; Michael Ray; Warren Davis; Lori M Minasian; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-09-06

6.  [The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT). Relevance for clinical practice].

Authors:  B J Schmitz-Dräger; C Fischer; E Bismarck; H J Dörsam; G Lümmen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Genomic biomarkers for molecular imaging: predicting the future.

Authors:  Mathew L Thakur
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.446

8.  Polymorphisms in CYP17 and CYP3A4 and prostate cancer in men of African descent.

Authors:  Emanuela Taioli; Vestra Sears; Alexis Watson; Rafael E Flores-Obando; Maria D Jackson; Flora A Ukoli; Ilce M de Syllos Cólus; Pedro Fernandez; Norma McFarlane-Anderson; Elaine A Ostrander; Iara S Rodrigues; Janet L Stanford; Jack A Taylor; Marshall Tulloch-Reid; Camille C R Ragin
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 4.104

9.  High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia of the prostate: the precursor lesion of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Debra L Zynger; Ximing Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2008-12-22

10.  High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Joseph C Klink; Ranko Miocinovic; Cristina Magi Galluzzi; Eric A Klein
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.