Literature DB >> 17499123

Frequency of verb use in young children who stutter.

Stacy A Wagovich1, Nan Bernstein Ratner.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Several recent studies have suggested that young children who stutter (CWS) tend to show depressed lexical performance relative to peers. Given the developmental literature as well as several studies of verb processing in individuals who stutter, verbs may pose a particular challenge for this group. The purpose of the present study was to examine verb use in CWS. In theory, if young CWS differ in their production of verbs, this finding would partially explain the findings of studies that probed conversational vocabulary skills more generally. Fifteen CWS and 15 children who do not stutter (CWNS) participated in a play-based conversational sample with a parent. Samples were analyzed for the total number of verbs, the number of different verbs, and the proportion of general all-purpose (GAP) verbs within the samples. CWS produced significantly fewer different verbs and total verbs than the CWNS. However, previously reported near-significant differences in utterance length between groups would appear to temper the robustness of this finding. The groups did not differ in the proportion of GAP verbs used, suggesting that the CWS did not over-rely on GAP verbs in conversational language production but rather used these verbs to the same extent as their peers. EDUCATIONAL
OBJECTIVES: As a result of this activity, the participant will be able to: (1) relate the purpose and rationale for examining verb use in children who stutter (CWS); (2) summarize the procedures used to assess verb use and GAP verb use in the present study; (3) explain the findings of the present study; (4) relate findings to the extant literature on lexical diversity in CWS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17499123     DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2007.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fluency Disord        ISSN: 0094-730X            Impact factor:   2.538


  8 in total

1.  Dissociations among linguistic, cognitive, and auditory-motor neuroanatomical domains in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ai Leen Choo; Evamarie Burnham; Kristin Hicks; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 2.  Language abilities of children who stutter: a meta-analytical review.

Authors:  Katerina Ntourou; Edward G Conture; Mark W Lipsey
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Stuttering and natural speech processing of semantic and syntactic constraints on verbs.

Authors:  Christine Weber-Fox; Amanda Hampton
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Past tense marking in the spontaneous speech of preschool children who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Jessica Bauman; Nancy E Hall; Stacy A Wagovich; Christine M Weber-Fox; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.538

5.  Early childhood stuttering and electrophysiological indices of language processing.

Authors:  Christine Weber-Fox; Amanda Hampton Wray; Hayley Arnold
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 2.538

6.  Use of a phoneme monitoring task to examine lexical access in adults who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Timothy A Howell; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.538

7.  Preliminary Evidence That Growth in Productive Language Differentiates Childhood Stuttering Persistence and Recovery.

Authors:  Kathryn A Leech; Nan Bernstein Ratner; Barbara Brown; Christine M Weber
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Neurodevelopment for syntactic processing distinguishes childhood stuttering recovery versus persistence.

Authors:  Evan Usler; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.025

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.