Literature DB >> 17498911

Avoidance of axillary lymph node dissection in selected patients with node-positive breast cancer.

M Noguchi1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Currently, it is standard practice to avoid ALND in patients with negative SLN, whereas this procedure is mandated for those with positive SLN. However, there has been some debate regarding the necessity of complete ALND in all patients with positive SLN. This review article discusses the issues related to eliminating the need for ALND in selected patients with positive nodes.
METHODS: A review of the English language medical literature was performed using the MEDLINE database and cross-referencing major articles on the subject, focusing on the last 10 years.
RESULTS: Currently, complete ALND is mandated in patients with SLN macrometastases as well as those with clinically positive nodes. It is not clear whether SLN biopsy is appropriate for axillary staging in patients with initially clinically positive nodes (N1) that become clinically node-negative (N0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although there is debate regarding whether ALND should be performed in patients with micrometastases in the SLN, it seems premature to abandon ALND in clinical practice. Moreover, it remains unclear whether it is appropriate to avoid complete ALND in patients with ITC-positive SLN alone.
CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of data from randomised trials, the long-term impact of SLN biopsy alone on axillary recurrence and survival rate in patients with SLN micrometastases as well as those with ITC-positive SLN remains uncertain. These important issues must be determined by careful analysis of the results of ongoing clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17498911     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  7 in total

1.  Macrometastasis, micrometastasis, and isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes of early breast cancers: a 10-year histopathological and survival analysis of 537 Asian patients.

Authors:  Michael Co; Ava Kwong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Eight-year experience with the intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer in a North-Italian university center.

Authors:  Carla Cedolini; Serena Bertozzi; Luca Seriau; Ambrogio P Londero; Serena Concina; Federico Cattin; Onelio Geatti; Carla Di Loreto; Andrea Risaliti
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-12-15

Review 3.  Advantage of sentinel lymph node biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Hirotaka Iwase; Yutaka Yamamoto; Teru Kawasoe; Mutsuko Ibusuki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Factors Influencing Non-sentinel Node Involvement in Sentinel Node Positive Patients and Validation of MSKCC Nomogram in Indian Breast Cancer Population.

Authors:  Naveen Padmanabhan; Muhamed Faizal Ayub; Khadher Hussain; Ann Kurien; Selvi Radhakrishna
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-12-05

5.  A mini-review on factors and countermeasures associated with false-negative sentinel lymph node biopsies in breast cancer.

Authors:  Chao Han; Li Yang; Wenshu Zuo
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  The prognostic value of lymph node cross-sectional cancer area in node-positive breast cancer: a comparison with N stage and lymph node ratio.

Authors:  Yanxia Li; Earle Holmes; Karan Shah; Kevin Albuquerque; Anna Szpaderska; Cağatay Erşahin
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2012-10-04

7.  Predictors of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer with metastasis in the sentinel node.

Authors:  Yidong Zhou; Xin Huang; Feng Mao; Yan Lin; Songjie Shen; Jinghong Guan; Xiaohui Zhang; Qiang Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.