Literature DB >> 17498109

A comparison of NCEP-ATPIII and IDF metabolic syndrome definitions with relation to metabolic syndrome-associated sexual dysfunction.

Giovanni Corona1, Edoardo Mannucci2, Luisa Petrone3, Claude Schulman4, Giancarlo Balercia5, Alessandra D Fisher3, Valerio Chiarini6, Gianni Forti7, Mario Maggi8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a clustering of cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors, often associated with erectile dysfunction (ED) and hypogonadism. Recently, the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) proposed a substantial revision of the National Cholesterol Education Program-Third Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP-ATPIII) MetS criteria, essentially lowering the diagnostic cutoff values. Aim. To investigate the associations between these two recently proposed definitions of MetS with the relative risk of arteriogenic ED and hypogonadism in a large cohort of patients with male sexual dysfunction.
METHODS: A consecutive series of 1086 patients with sexual dysfunction (mean age 51.9 +/- 12.8 years) was studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Several hormonal, biochemical, and instrumental (penile Doppler ultrasound) parameters were studied, along with ANDROTEST, a 12-item validated structured interview, specifically designed for the screening hypogonadism in a sexual dysfunction population. In particular, a score >8 is predictive of low testosterone (<10.4 nmol/L) with a sensitivity and specificity of about 70%.
RESULTS: The prevalence of MetS was 32.0% and 44.7% according to NCEP-ATPIII and IDF criteria, respectively. After adjustment for confounding factors, only NCEP-ATPIII was significantly associated with dynamic prostaglandin E(1)-stimulated penile flow (Vpmax, B = -7.7 +/- 3.8; P < 0.05). Patients with MetS defined according to both criteria reported lower total and free testosterone levels, higher prevalence of hypogonadism, and higher ANDROTEST score. However, when IDF, but not NCEP-ATPIII, criteria were fulfilled, the prevalence of hypogonadism was significantly lower than that observed in patients fulfilling both criteria (15.6% vs. 34.8%, respectively; P < 0.00001). Conversely, patients fulfilling NCEP-ATPIII, but not IDF, criteria did not show a significant different prevalence of hypogonadism than those positive for both sets of criteria (30.8% vs. 34.8%; P = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ED, NCEP-ATPIII criteria seem to be a better predictor of hypogonadism and impaired penile blood flow than IDF ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17498109     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00498.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  18 in total

1.  Occurrence of erectile dysfunction, testosterone deficiency syndrome and metabolic syndrome in patients with abdominal obesity. Where is a sufficient level of testosterone?

Authors:  Juraj Fillo; Jan Breza; Michaela Levčíkova; Jan Luha; Anna Vachulova; Štefan Durdík; Peter Labaš
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Cardiovascular risk engines can help in selecting patients to be evaluated by dynamic penile color doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  G Corona; E Mannucci; A D Fisher; F Lotti; E Bandini; L Vignozzi; G Balercia; F Paggi; L Petrone; G Forti; M Maggi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Ethnic disparities in metabolic syndrome in malaysia: an analysis by risk factors.

Authors:  Andrew K G Tan; Richard A Dunn; Steven T Yen
Journal:  Metab Syndr Relat Disord       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 1.894

Review 4.  Adrenal steroids and the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Stephen P Thomson; Craig S Stump; L Romayne Kurukulasuriya; James R Sowers
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  Hypogonadism and metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  G Corona; G Rastrelli; A Morelli; L Vignozzi; E Mannucci; M Maggi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Changes of meibomian glands in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Tao Yu; Wei-Yun Shi; Ai-Ping Song; Yang Gao; Guang-Fu Dang; Gang Ding
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Metabolic syndrome and erectile dysfunction among obese non-diabetic subjects.

Authors:  A Gatti; E Mandosi; M Fallarino; A Radicioni; E Morini; F Maiani; V Trischitta; A Lenzi; S Morano
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Importance of Different Grades of Abdominal Obesity on Testosterone Level, Erectile Dysfunction, and Clinical Coincidence.

Authors:  Juraj Fillo; Michaela Levcikova; Martina Ondrusova; Jan Breza; Peter Labas
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-07-08

9.  Reversal of voltage-dependent erectile responses in the Zucker obese-diabetic rat by rosuvastatin-altered RhoA/Rho-kinase signaling.

Authors:  Christopher J Wingard; Fatiha Moukdar; Raju Y Prasad; Brook L Cathey; Lois Wilkinson
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 10.  Vardenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: an overview of the clinical evidence.

Authors:  Antonio Martín Morales; Vincenzo Mirone; John Dean; Pierre Costa
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.