Literature DB >> 17497308

Cancer survivorship research: state of knowledge, challenges and opportunities.

Noreen M Aziz1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Seminal advances in early detection of and treatment strategies for cancer have led to burgeoning numbers of cancer survivors. While most therapeutic modalities for cancer are beneficial and lifesaving, they are associated with adverse long-term and late sequelae.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature review using MEDLINE to identify studies examining adverse medical outcomes and post-treatment follow-up care among long-term survivors. Emerging concepts in survivorship research such as definitional issues, research paradigms and methodologic concerns were also examined.
RESULTS: Long-term or late adverse sequelae are more prevalent, serious, and persistent than expected in survivors of pediatric and adult cancer, but remain understudied especially among those diagnosed as adults. Follow-up care relevant to survivorship outcomes is neither standardized nor guideline or evidence based for most adult cancers, and optimal practices have yet to be defined. DISCUSSION: Adverse sequelae contribute to burden of illness, health care costs, and decreased length and quality of survival. To-date, very few studies have compared survivor outcomes pre-and post diagnosis. It is critical to examine under-researched questions and understudied survivor groups. Regular follow-up care and monitoring of health status post cancer treatment should 1) permit the timely diagnosis and treatment of adverse outcomes; 2) enable timely diagnosis and treatment of recurrences; 3) facilitate screening and early detection of second cancer(s); 4) allow for detection and management of co-morbidities; and 5) provide the opportunity for preventive strategies such as lifestyle changes. Research findings to-date underscore the need for continued cancer survivorship research that will: inform our understanding of the mechanisms underlying adverse sequelae; lead to the design of less toxic treatments; test the effectiveness of interventions - medical, pharmacologic, and behavioral - that reduce adverse outcomes; test models of post-treatment follow-up care; develop an evidence base for optimal follow-up care practices; and inform survivor and provider decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17497308     DOI: 10.1080/02841860701367878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  94 in total

1.  What does the term 'survivor' mean to individuals diagnosed with a haematological malignancy? Findings from Australia.

Authors:  Pam McGrath; Hamish Holewa
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Investigating the perceived feasibility of integrative medicine in a conventional oncology setting: yoga therapy as a treatment for breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Suzanne Slocum-Gori; A Fuchsia Howard; Lynda G Balneaves; Arminée Kazanjian
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 3.279

3.  The health-related quality of life in long-term colorectal cancer survivors study: objectives, methods and patient sample.

Authors:  M Jane Mohler; Stephen Joel Coons; Mark C Hornbrook; Lisa J Herrinton; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 4.  [Prognosis scores for spinal metastases].

Authors:  N H von der Höh; J Gulow; S K Tschöke; A Völker; C E Heyde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Development and validation of the Short-Form Survivor Unmet Needs Survey (SF-SUNS).

Authors:  H Sharon Campbell; Alix E Hall; Rob W Sanson-Fisher; Daniel Barker; Donna Turner; Jill Taylor-Brown
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Trait anxiety as an independent predictor of poor health-related quality of life and post-traumatic stress symptoms in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Stephen L Ristvedt; Kathryn M Trinkaus
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2009-01-24

7.  Refinement and psychometric evaluation of the impact of cancer scale.

Authors:  Catherine M Crespi; Patricia A Ganz; Laura Petersen; Adrienne Castillo; Bette Caan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Detailed methods of two home-based vegetable gardening intervention trials to improve diet, physical activity, and quality of life in two different populations of cancer survivors.

Authors:  Mallory G Cases; Andrew D Frugé; Jennifer F De Los Santos; Julie L Locher; Alan B Cantor; Kerry P Smith; Tony A Glover; Harvey J Cohen; Michael Daniel; Casey D Morrow; Douglas R Moellering; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Lifestyle modification in cervical cancer survivors: an ongoing need.

Authors:  Matthew P Schlumbrecht; Charlotte C Sun; Marilyn S Huang; Fran Zandstra; Diane C Bodurka
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.437

10.  Male coping processes as demonstrated in the context of a cancer-related social support group.

Authors:  Stephen K Trapp; Jacqueline D Woods; Alicia Grove; Marilyn Stern
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.