Literature DB >> 17496604

Preoperative osseous dysmorphology in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: a quantitative analysis of computed tomography data.

Alex A Kane1, Valerie Burke DeLeon, Christopher Valeri, Devra B Becker, Joan T Richtsmeier, Lun-Jou Lo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to quantitate preoperative osseous dysmorphology in a homogeneous group of 3-month-old infants with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.
METHODS: High-resolution computed tomography scans of 28 infants with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate were the basis for study. Coordinate data from 43 landmarks on the skull were collected using surface-rendered reconstructions of scan data. Euclidean distance matrix analysis was used to assess the degree of asymmetry between the cleft and noncleft sides of the craniofacial skeleton.
RESULTS: Linear distances involving primary and secondary landmarks (those that are located on or within the bony cleft and those that are near the cleft in the adjacent oronasal area, respectively) were highly asymmetric, with significantly greater distances on the cleft side. In addition, small (1 to 5 percent) but statistically significant asymmetries in linear distances were found involving tertiary landmarks (those that are not directly associated with the cleft or adjacent oronasal area). Most linear distances involving the nasion, zygomaxillare superius, and frontozygomatic junction were significantly greater on the cleft side, and certain linear distances in and around the middle cranial fossa were significantly smaller on the cleft side.
CONCLUSIONS: The extreme asymmetry of primary and secondary landmarks is explained by the cleft itself and the obvious displacement of the premaxilla toward the noncleft side. The subtler, statistically significant asymmetry of the tertiary landmarks supports the idea that the unilateral cleft affects development of the entire face and possibly the cranial base. Euclidean distance matrix analysis of computed tomography landmark data is a useful methodology for the quantitative morphometry of children with untreated unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17496604     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000258519.88178.c4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  Facial asymmetry in young healthy subjects evaluated by statistical shape analysis.

Authors:  Ilker Ercan; Senem Turan Ozdemir; Abdullah Etoz; Deniz Sigirli; R Shane Tubbs; Marios Loukas; Ibrahim Guney
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Supremacy of modern morphometry in typing renal oncocytoma and malignant look-alikes.

Authors:  Franziska Erlmeier; Annette Feuchtinger; Daniela Borgmann; Martina Rudelius; Michael Autenrieth; Axel Karl Walch; Gregor Weirich
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.304

3.  Morphological integration of the skull in craniofacial anomalies.

Authors:  J T Richtsmeier; V B Deleon
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Localization of basicranium midline by submentovertex projection for the evaluation of condylar asymmetry.

Authors:  Michele Maglione; Fulvia Costantinides
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-01-18

5.  Outcome of facial contour asymmetry after conventional two-dimensional versus computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in cleft orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Po-Jung Hsu; Rafael Denadai; Betty C J Pai; Hsiu-Hsia Lin; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.