Literature DB >> 17496467

Validation of the OMRON M7 (HEM-780-E) blood pressure measuring device in a population requiring large cuff use according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.

Ramzi N El Feghali1, Jirar A Topouchian, Bruno M Pannier, Hiba A El Assaad, Roland G Asmar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A high percentage of hypertensive patients present an arm circumference of over 32 cm; the use of a large cuff is therefore recommended. Validation studies are usually performed in the general population using a standard-size cuff. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the Omron M7 device in a population with an arm circumference ranging from 32 to 42 cm.
DESIGN: A validation study was performed according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. This protocol is divided into two phases: the first phase is performed on 15 selected participants (45 pairs of blood-pressure measurements); if the device passes this phase, 18 supplementary participants are included (54 pairs of blood-pressure measurements), making a total number of 33 participants (99 pairs of blood-pressure measurements), on whom the analysis is performed.
METHODS: For each participant, four blood-pressure measurements were performed simultaneously by two trained observers, using mercury sphygmomanometers fitted with a Y tube; the measurements alternated with three by the test device. The difference between the blood-pressure value given by the device and that obtained by the two observers (mean of the two observations) was calculated for each measure. The 99 pairs of blood-pressure differences were classified into three categories (<or=5, <or=10 and <or=15 mmHg). The number of differences in each category was compared with the number required by the European Society of Hypertension protocol.
RESULTS: The Omron M7 device passed the first and the second phases of the validation process. The average differences between the two observers were 1.5+/-3.2 and -0.5+/-2.2 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, and those between the device and the mercury sphygmomanometer were -1.6+/-6.7 for systolic blood pressure and -0.12+/-4.0 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure Readings that differ by less than 5, 10 and 15 mmHg for systolic blood-pressure and diastolic blood-pressure values fulfill the recommendation criteria of the European Society of Hypertension protocol.
CONCLUSIONS: The Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) device fulfilled the validation criteria of the international protocol in a population with an arm circumference ranging from 32 to 42 cm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17496467     DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3280b08367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  9 in total

1.  Comparisons of automated blood pressures in a primary health care setting with self-measurements at the office and at home using the Omron i-C10 device.

Authors:  Isam Al-Karkhi; Raad Al-Rubaiy; Ulf Rosenqvist; Magnus Falk; Fredrik H Nystrom
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.444

2.  Relationship between body composition and left ventricular geometry using three dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Ben Corden; Antonio de Marvao; Timothy J Dawes; Wenzhe Shi; Daniel Rueckert; Stuart A Cook; Declan P O'Regan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  Cross-sectional surveillance study to phenotype lorry drivers' sedentary behaviours, physical activity and cardio-metabolic health.

Authors:  Veronica Varela-Mato; Orlagh O'Shea; James A King; Thomas Yates; David J Stensel; Stuart Jh Biddle; Myra A Nimmo; Stacy A Clemes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Questionable accuracy of home blood pressure measurements in the obese population - Validation of the Microlife WatchBP O3® and Omron RS6® devices according to the European Society of Hypertension-International Protocol.

Authors:  Alaa Azaki; Reem Diab; Aya Harb; Roland Asmar; Mirna N Chahine
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2017-02-27

5.  Arterial Stiffness Is Associated With Cytomegalovirus-Specific Senescent CD8+ T Cells.

Authors:  Hee Tae Yu; Jong-Chan Youn; Jong Hoon Kim; Yeon-Jae Seong; Su-Hyung Park; Hyeon Chang Kim; Won-Woo Lee; Sungha Park; Eui-Cheol Shin
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Association of an Automated Blood Pressure Measurement Quality Improvement Program With Terminal Digit Preference and Recorded Mean Blood Pressure in 11 Clinics.

Authors:  Thomas E Kottke; Jeffrey P Anderson; Jacob D Zillhardt; JoAnn M Sperl-Hillen; Patrick J O'Connor; Beverly B Green; Rae Ann Williams; Beth M Averbeck; Michael N Stiffman; MarySue Beran; Michael Rakotz; Karen L Margolis
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-08-01

7.  Type 2 diabetes and cardiac autonomic neuropathy screening using dynamic pupillometry.

Authors:  A G Lerner; A Bernabé-Ortiz; R Ticse; A Hernandez; Y Huaylinos; M E Pinto; G Málaga; W Checkley; R H Gilman; J J Miranda
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.213

8.  Effectiveness of exercise at workplace in physical fitness: uncontrolled randomized study.

Authors:  Antônio José Grande; Valter Silva; Sérgio Alencar Parra
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar

9.  Standing up against office sitting: A study protocol.

Authors:  Philippe Gradidge; Merling Phaswana; Katrien Wijndaele; Nigel Crowther; Catherine Draper
Journal:  S Afr J Physiother       Date:  2020-09-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.