PURPOSE: The present study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin-combination therapy (NDP/5-FU [5-FU arm] or NDP/S-1 [S-1 arm] ) for the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHOD:Previously non-treated oral squamous cell carcinoma patients were eligible. Patients received 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)iv, as a 24-hour infusion (day 1 to 5) followed by NDP 80 to 100 mg/m(2) iv (day 1), or S-1 60 to 80 mg/m(2) orally twice a day (day 1 to 14) followed by NDP 80 mg/m(2) iv (day 8) every 28 days for one or two cycles. RESULTS: In total, 32 patients (18 in the 5-FU arm, 14 in the S-1 arm) were enrolled. Twenty patients were male and 12 were female. Median age was 57 years (range 20 years to 87 years). Thirty-one patients had a performance status (PS) oF 0, and 1 patient had a PS 1. Three patients were stage I, 12 stage III, and 12 were stage IV. The overall response rate was 69% (5-FU arm,72%;S-1 arm,64%). Two patients achieved a complete response, 20 patients a partial response, and 10 patients had no change. Grade 3 leucopenia, grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia and liver injury occurred in 6% (one in the 5-FU arm, and one in the S-1 arm), 9% (two in the 5-FU arm, and one in the S-1 arm), and 3% (one in the 5-FU arm), respectively. No other severe toxicities were observed. RESULTS:Response rate and toxicities were similar in both arms. However, the psychosocial stress on patients in the S-1 arm was reduced compared to that in the 5-FU arm, which required hospitalization for a longer period. The outcome in the present study needs further investigation.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The present study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin-combination therapy (NDP/5-FU [5-FU arm] or NDP/S-1 [S-1 arm] ) for the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Previously non-treated oral squamous cell carcinomapatients were eligible. Patients received 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)iv, as a 24-hour infusion (day 1 to 5) followed by NDP 80 to 100 mg/m(2) iv (day 1), or S-1 60 to 80 mg/m(2) orally twice a day (day 1 to 14) followed by NDP 80 mg/m(2) iv (day 8) every 28 days for one or two cycles. RESULTS: In total, 32 patients (18 in the 5-FU arm, 14 in the S-1 arm) were enrolled. Twenty patients were male and 12 were female. Median age was 57 years (range 20 years to 87 years). Thirty-one patients had a performance status (PS) oF 0, and 1 patient had a PS 1. Three patients were stage I, 12 stage III, and 12 were stage IV. The overall response rate was 69% (5-FU arm,72%;S-1 arm,64%). Two patients achieved a complete response, 20 patients a partial response, and 10 patients had no change. Grade 3 leucopenia, grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia and liver injury occurred in 6% (one in the 5-FU arm, and one in the S-1 arm), 9% (two in the 5-FU arm, and one in the S-1 arm), and 3% (one in the 5-FU arm), respectively. No other severe toxicities were observed. RESULTS: Response rate and toxicities were similar in both arms. However, the psychosocial stress on patients in the S-1 arm was reduced compared to that in the 5-FU arm, which required hospitalization for a longer period. The outcome in the present study needs further investigation.