Literature DB >> 17496223

DNA sequencing research group: 2006 general survey of DNA sequencing facilities.

David Needleman1, Debbie Adam, Michelle Detwiler, Helaman Escobar, Jan Kieleczawa, Rashmi Pershard, Peter Schweitzer, Glenis Wiebe.   

Abstract

Over the past few years, technological advances in automated DNA sequencing have had a profound effect on the nature of DNA sequencing laboratories. To characterize the changes occurring within DNA sequencing facilities, the DNA Sequencing Research Group conducted three previous studies, in 1998, 2000, and 2003. A new general survey has been designed and conducted by the DSRG to capture the current status of DNA sequencing facilities in all sectors. Included were questions regarding facility administration, pricing, instrumentation, technology, protocols, and operation. The results of the survey are presented here, accompanied by comparisons to the previous surveys. These comparisons formed a basis for the discussion of trends within the facilities in response to the dynamics of a changing technology.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17496223      PMCID: PMC2062535     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Tech        ISSN: 1524-0215


  1 in total

1.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment.

Authors:  B Ewing; L Hillier; M C Wendl; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  Optimization of protocol for sequencing of difficult templates.

Authors:  Jan Kieleczawa; Erica Mazaika
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2010-07

2.  Bioinformatics Core Survey Highlights the Challenges Facing Data Analysis Facilities.

Authors:  Julie A Dragon; Chris Gates; Shannan Ho Sui; John N Hutchinson; R Krishna Murthy Karuturi; Alper Kucukural; Shawn Polson; Alberto Riva; Matthew Lee Settles; Jyothi Thimmapuram; Stuart S Levine
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2020-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.