L K Micklesfield1, J Hugo, C Johnson, T D Noakes, E V Lambert. 1. UCT/MRC Research Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, UCT School of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa. lisam@sports.uct.ac.za
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors associated with menstrual dysfunction, self-reported bone stress injuries and energy balance in women runners. METHODS: 613 runners were randomly sampled during the registration period for an endurance event. Demographic information, including self-reported height and weight, training and injury history and menstrual history, was collected by questionnaire. RESULTS: Ultra-marathon (ULTRA) participants (n = 276) were significantly older (mean (SD) 39 (8.2) vs 34 (10.5) years; p<0.001), lighter (58.2 (6.6) vs 59.6 (8.3) kg; p<0.05) and reported a higher training volume (p<0.001) than half-marathon (HALF) participants (n = 337). Significantly more ULTRA subjects than HALF subjects reported a previous bone stress injury (21% vs 14%; p<0.05). There was no difference between the groups for menstrual status, but age at menarche was later (p<0.01) in the ULTRA group. Data were combined according to the absence (REG; n = 368/602 (61%)) or presence (IRREG; n = 234/602 (39%)) of a history of menstrual irregularity. Subject morphology was similar between groups, but the IRREG group had a higher self-reported measure on the self-loathing subscale (SLSS; p<0.01). The whole group was then classified according to current menstrual status, with 165 women being classified as currently irregular. (OLIGO/AMEN; 11.6%) and 445 women as currently regular (EUMEN; 88.4%). There were no morphological differences between the groups, however the OLIGO/AMEN group had a later age of menarche (p<0.01) than the EUMEN group. Further, women who reported a previous bone stress injury had higher SLSS scores than those who did not (2.91 (0.98) vs 2.68 (0.84); p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There may be two independent mechanisms associated with energy balance, which are related to bone stress injuries, but may not necessarily be related to menstrual dysfunction.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors associated with menstrual dysfunction, self-reported bone stress injuries and energy balance in women runners. METHODS: 613 runners were randomly sampled during the registration period for an endurance event. Demographic information, including self-reported height and weight, training and injury history and menstrual history, was collected by questionnaire. RESULTS: Ultra-marathon (ULTRA) participants (n = 276) were significantly older (mean (SD) 39 (8.2) vs 34 (10.5) years; p<0.001), lighter (58.2 (6.6) vs 59.6 (8.3) kg; p<0.05) and reported a higher training volume (p<0.001) than half-marathon (HALF) participants (n = 337). Significantly more ULTRA subjects than HALF subjects reported a previous bone stress injury (21% vs 14%; p<0.05). There was no difference between the groups for menstrual status, but age at menarche was later (p<0.01) in the ULTRA group. Data were combined according to the absence (REG; n = 368/602 (61%)) or presence (IRREG; n = 234/602 (39%)) of a history of menstrual irregularity. Subject morphology was similar between groups, but the IRREG group had a higher self-reported measure on the self-loathing subscale (SLSS; p<0.01). The whole group was then classified according to current menstrual status, with 165 women being classified as currently irregular. (OLIGO/AMEN; 11.6%) and 445 women as currently regular (EUMEN; 88.4%). There were no morphological differences between the groups, however the OLIGO/AMEN group had a later age of menarche (p<0.01) than the EUMEN group. Further, women who reported a previous bone stress injury had higher SLSS scores than those who did not (2.91 (0.98) vs 2.68 (0.84); p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There may be two independent mechanisms associated with energy balance, which are related to bone stress injuries, but may not necessarily be related to menstrual dysfunction.
Authors: Karen K Miller; Ellen E Lee; Elizabeth A Lawson; Madhusmita Misra; Jennifer Minihan; Steven K Grinspoon; Suzanne Gleysteen; Diane Mickley; David Herzog; Anne Klibanski Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Kristin L Cobb; Laura K Bachrach; Gail Greendale; Robert Marcus; Robert M Neer; Jeri Nieves; Mary Fran Sowers; Byron W Brown; Geetha Gopalakrishnan; Crystal Luetters; Heather K Tanner; Bridget Ward; Jennifer L Kelsey Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Michelle P Warren; Jeanne Brooks-Gunn; Richard P Fox; Claire C Holderness; Emily P Hyle; William G Hamilton; Linda Hamilton Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Volker Scheer; Nicholas B Tiller; Stéphane Doutreleau; Morteza Khodaee; Beat Knechtle; Andrew Pasternak; Daniel Rojas-Valverde Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-09-20 Impact factor: 11.928
Authors: Therese E Johnston; Colleen Dempsey; Frances Gilman; Ryan Tomlinson; Ann-Katrin Jacketti; Jeremy Close Journal: Sports Health Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 3.843