Literature DB >> 17495643

Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists on luteal function.

Andrea J DiLuigi1, John C Nulsen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review addresses the effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists on various aspects of the luteal phase. RECENT
FINDINGS: Recent studies have shown that use of both gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists during in-vitro fertilization cycles leads to alterations in the hormonal profiles of the luteal phase as well as changes in endometrial histology. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists are effective in triggering final oocyte maturation and reducing the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Ongoing pregnancy rates are excellent after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger when luteal phase and early pregnancy supplementation with estradiol and progesterone is provided. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists have recently been used for luteal phase support in in-vitro fertilization cycles.
SUMMARY: Although gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists are clinically useful, they may have adverse effects on luteal function. Luteal phase supplementation significantly improves clinical outcomes in in-vitro fertilization cycles because it may correct some of these detrimental effects. Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to induce oocyte maturation is beneficial to patients who are at increased risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. The key factor in achieving favorable ongoing pregnancy rates with use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to induce oocyte maturation appears to be adequate luteal phase support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17495643     DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3281338874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  10 in total

1.  Addition of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist for luteal phase support in in-vitro fertilization: an analysis of 2739 cycles.

Authors:  Erhan Şimşek; Esra Bulgan Kılıçdağ; Pınar Çağlar Aytaç; Gonca Çoban; Seda Yüksel Şimşek; Tayfun Çok; Bülent Haydardedeoğlu
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01

2.  Patients' administration preferences: progesterone vaginal insert (Endometrin®) compared to intramuscular progesterone for Luteal phase support.

Authors:  Angeline N Beltsos; Mark D Sanchez; Kevin J Doody; Mark R Bush; Alice D Domar; Michael G Collins
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  Pregnancy rate following luteal phase support in Iranian women with polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Authors:  Fatemeh Foroozanfard; Hamidreza Saberi; Seyed Alireza Moraveji; Fatemeh Bazarganipour
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-11-01

4.  Non-invasive prediction of implantation window in controlled hyperstimulation cycles: Can the time from the menstrual day at embryo transfer to expected menstrual cycle give a clue?

Authors:  İlhan Şanverdi; Enis Özkaya; Tayfun Kutlu; Taylan Şenol; Munip Akalın; Eda Sayar Akalın; Yavuz Şahin; Ateş Karateke
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09-15

5.  Intramuscular progesterone versus 8% Crinone vaginal gel for luteal phase support following blastocyst cryopreserved single embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer B Bakkensen; Catherine Racowsky; Ann M Thomas; Andrea Lanes; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2020-07-01

6.  A Comparative Analysis of Outcomes Between Two Different Intramuscular Progesterone Preparations in Women Undergoing Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles.

Authors:  Srividya Seshadri; Rabi Odia; Ozkan Ozturk; Wiam Saab; Ali AlChami; Xavier Viñals Gonzalez; Saba Salim; Wael Saab; Paul Serha
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar

7.  Luteal Phase Support in assisted reproductive technology treatment: focus on Endometrin(R) (progesterone) vaginal insert.

Authors:  Jerome H Check
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Kisspeptin-54 triggers egg maturation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Channa N Jayasena; Ali Abbara; Alexander N Comninos; Gurjinder M K Nijher; Georgios Christopoulos; Shakunthala Narayanaswamy; Chioma Izzi-Engbeaya; Mathini Sridharan; Alexina J Mason; Jane Warwick; Deborah Ashby; Mohammad A Ghatei; Stephen R Bloom; Anna Carby; Geoffrey H Trew; Waljit S Dhillo
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Evaluation of the impact of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist as an adjuvant in luteal-phase support on IVF outcome.

Authors:  Dattaprasad B Inamdar; Abha Majumdar
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-09

10.  Association between serum estradiol level on the hCG administration day and IVF-ICSI outcome.

Authors:  Mustafa Kara; Tayfun Kutlu; Kenan Sofuoglu; Belgin Devranoglu; Tansel Cetinkaya
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2012-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.