Literature DB >> 17495104

Density allowances for broilers: where to set the limits?

I Estevez1.   

Abstract

Stocking density has critical implications for the broiler industry because higher returns can be obtained as the number of birds per unit space increases. Assigned densities have been primarily driven by cost-benefit analysis, but economic profit may come at the cost of reduced bird performance, health, and welfare if densities are excessive. These negative consequences are the primary reason for the increasing demands for guidelines that limit density allowances, even through legislation. Current recommended densities are rather variable, and therefore it is critical if guidelines are to be established that they be based on sound science. Published research consistently indicates that the health and welfare of broilers is compromised if space allowances drop below 0.0625 to 0.07 m2/bird (equivalent to about 34 to 38 kg/m2 depending on final BW). Negative consequences include reduced final BW, feed intake and food conversion, and greater incidence of foot-pad dermatitis, scratches, bruising, poorer feathering, and condemnations. A few studies have also found higher mortalities, tibial dischondroplasia, and some evidence of physiological stress. At the behavioral level, most studies indicate a reduction in space use and movement and higher frequencies of disturbances, which has been linked with a higher frequency of scratches and decline in carcass quality. Other main behavioral categories remain largely unchanged. However, results overwhelmingly suggest that while stocking density has major consequences for the health and welfare of broilers, the quality of the environment, which has been largely underestimated, is far more relevant. Advances in broiler welfare will be difficult to achieve unless some criteria for environmental quality are also established. The implications of this are that the welfare of broilers can be ensured at a range of (reasonable) densities, as long as the requirements for environmental quality are fulfilled. It is also essential for industry to realize that returns per unit of space in broiler production do tend to plateau if density is excessive, a result of the reduction in bird performance. In this paper I suggest a model that may be used to maximize productivity, health, and welfare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17495104     DOI: 10.1093/ps/86.6.1265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  28 in total

1.  Effects of genotype and population density on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and cost-benefits of broiler chickens in north central Nigeria.

Authors:  Abdulmojeed Yakubu; John A Ayoade; Yakubu M Dahiru
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Responses of male broiler chickens from two genetic groups to different stocking densities in a semi-arid subtropical environment.

Authors:  Kow Benyi; Owoahene Acheampong-Boateng; Kgabo T Mahlako
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Effects of stocking density and daily feed withdrawal periods on the performance of broiler chickens in a semi-arid environment.

Authors:  Mashudu Daniel Rambau; Mulanga Lenticia Mudau; Sibusiso David Makhanya; Kow Benyi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 4.  Stocking density: a clue for improving social behavior, welfare, health indices along with productivity performances of quail (Coturnix coturnix)-a review.

Authors:  Mohamed I El Sabry; Saber S A Hassan; Manal M Zaki; Farid K R Stino
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  Environmental temperature and stocking density effects on acute phase proteins, heat shock protein 70, circulating corticosterone and performance in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Pardis Najafi; Idrus Zulkifli; Nurfarahin Amat Jajuli; Abdoreza Soleimani Farjam; Suriya Kumari Ramiah; Anna Aryani Amir; Emily O'Reily; David Eckersall
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.787

6.  Access to barrier perches improves behavior repertoire in broilers.

Authors:  Beth A Ventura; Frank Siewerdt; Inma Estevez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Impact of Heat Stress on Poultry Production.

Authors:  Lucas J Lara; Marcos H Rostagno
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 8.  Animal Welfare and Food Safety Aspects of Confining Broiler Chickens to Cages.

Authors:  Sara Shields; Michael Greger
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Effects of dietary tryptophan and stocking density on the performance, meat quality, and metabolic status of broilers.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Zhizhi Min; Jianmin Yuan; Bingkun Zhang; Yuming Guo
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2014-09-26

10.  Space availability in confined sheep during pregnancy, effects in movement patterns and use of space.

Authors:  Xavier Averós; Areta Lorea; Ignacia Beltrán de Heredia; Josune Arranz; Roberto Ruiz; Inma Estevez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.