BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA) is insensitive to slow flow; however, the use of MR imaging contrast agents helps to visualize slow-flow vessels and avoids overestimation of vascular occlusion. The purpose of this study was to correlate pre- and postcontrast 3D TOF MRA with the results of conventional angiography during endovascular reperfusion therapy and to determine the accuracy of postcontrast 3D TOF MRA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients who underwent endovascular reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke were retrospectively analyzed. MR imaging techniques included single-slab 3D TOF MRA with and without contrast, as well as perfusion-weighted imaging. Angiography during reperfusion therapy was used as a standard of reference. Affected arteries were divided into segments either proximal or distal to the lesion, and pre- and postcontrast MRA signals were graded as absent, diminished or narrowed, or normal. RESULTS: In 2 of 5 patients with arterial stenosis and 6 of 8 patients with complete occlusion, MRA signal intensity proximal to each lesion was absent, indicating a proximal pseudo-occlusion on precontrast MRA. Postcontrast MRA demonstrated an arterial signal intensity proximal to the stenotic or occlusive lesions in all 13 patients. Arterial signal intensity distal to the occlusion was identified on postcontrast MRA in 7 of 8 patients having complete occlusion, and the extent of occlusion on postcontrast MRA was similar to results of conventional angiography. CONCLUSION: In this small series, postcontrast 3D TOF MRA more accurately delineated the extent of stenotic or occlusive arterial lesions than precontrast MRA.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA) is insensitive to slow flow; however, the use of MR imaging contrast agents helps to visualize slow-flow vessels and avoids overestimation of vascular occlusion. The purpose of this study was to correlate pre- and postcontrast 3D TOF MRA with the results of conventional angiography during endovascular reperfusion therapy and to determine the accuracy of postcontrast 3D TOF MRA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients who underwent endovascular reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke were retrospectively analyzed. MR imaging techniques included single-slab 3D TOF MRA with and without contrast, as well as perfusion-weighted imaging. Angiography during reperfusion therapy was used as a standard of reference. Affected arteries were divided into segments either proximal or distal to the lesion, and pre- and postcontrast MRA signals were graded as absent, diminished or narrowed, or normal. RESULTS: In 2 of 5 patients with arterial stenosis and 6 of 8 patients with complete occlusion, MRA signal intensity proximal to each lesion was absent, indicating a proximal pseudo-occlusion on precontrast MRA. Postcontrast MRA demonstrated an arterial signal intensity proximal to the stenotic or occlusive lesions in all 13 patients. Arterial signal intensity distal to the occlusion was identified on postcontrast MRA in 7 of 8 patients having complete occlusion, and the extent of occlusion on postcontrast MRA was similar to results of conventional angiography. CONCLUSION: In this small series, postcontrast 3D TOF MRA more accurately delineated the extent of stenotic or occlusive arterial lesions than precontrast MRA.
Authors: P Pantano; D Toni; F Caramia; A Falcou; M Fiorelli; C Argentino; L M Fantozzi; L Bozzao Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Janice J Yang; Michael D Hill; William F Morrish; Mark E Hudon; Philip A Barber; Andrew M Demchuk; Robert J Sevick; Richard Frayne Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: A S Al-Smadi; R N Abdalla; A H Elmokadem; A Shaibani; M C Hurley; M B Potts; B S Jahromi; T J Carroll; S A Ansari Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: K Alfke; U Jensen; C Pool; A Rohr; R Brüning; J Weber; T Bartsch; R Stingele; O Jansen Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2010-11-26 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: M Ernst; N D Forkert; L Brehmer; G Thomalla; S Siemonsen; J Fiehler; A Kemmling Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-12-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Alexander Radbruch; Johanna Mucke; Ferdinand Schweser; Andreas Deistung; Peter Alexander Ringleb; Christian Herbert Ziener; Matthias Roethke; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Sabine Heiland; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Martin Bendszus; Stefan Rohde Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 3.240