Literature DB >> 17494558

Identification of sensitive and specific avian influenza polymerase chain reaction methods through blind ring trials organized in the European Union.

M J Slomka1, V J Coward, J Banks, B Z Löndt, I H Brown, J Voermans, G Koch, K J Handberg, P H Jørgensen, M Cherbonnel-Pansart, V Jestin, G Cattoli, I Capua, A Ejdersund, P Thorén, G Czifra.   

Abstract

Many different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocols have been used for detection and characterization of avian influenza (AI) virus isolates, mainly in research settings. Blind ring trials were conducted to determine the most sensitive and specific AI PCR protocols from a group of six European Union (EU) laboratories. In part 1 of the ring trial the laboratories used their own methods to test a panel of 10 reconstituted anonymized clinical specimens, and the best methods were selected as recommended protocols for part 2, in which 16 RNA specimens were tested. Both panels contained H5, H7, other AI subtypes, and non-AI avian pathogens. Outcomes included verification of 1) generic AI identification by highly sensitive and specific M-gene real-time PCR, and 2) conventional PCRs that were effective for detection and identification of H5 and H7 viruses. The latter included virus pathotyping by amplicon sequencing. The use of recommended protocols resulted in improved results among all six laboratories in part 2, reflecting increased sensitivity and specificity. This included improved H5/H7 identification and pathotyping observed among all laboratories in part 2. Details of these PCR methods are provided. In summary, this study has contributed to the harmonization of AI PCR protocols in EU laboratories and influenced AI laboratory contingency planning following the first European reports of H5N1 highly pathogenic AI during autumn 2005.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17494558     DOI: 10.1637/7674-063006R1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  31 in total

1.  Complementary monoclonal antibody-based dot ELISA for universal detection of H5 avian influenza virus.

Authors:  Fang He; Retno D Soejoedono; Sri Murtini; Michael Goutama; Jimmy Kwang
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.605

2.  Genetic characterization of the NS gene indicates co-circulation of two sub-lineages of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus of H5N1 subtype in Northern Europe in 2006.

Authors:  Siamak Zohari; Peter Gyarmati; Peter Thorén; György Czifra; Caroline Bröjer; Sándor Belák; Mikael Berg
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 2.332

3.  Clade 2.3.4.4 avian influenza A (H5N8) outbreak in commercial poultry, Iran, 2016: the first report and update data.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Ghafouri; Arash GhalyanchiLangeroudi; Hossein Maghsoudloo; Reza Kh Farahani; Hamed Abdollahi; Farshad Tehrani; Mohammad Hossein Fallah
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-05-07       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Phylogenetic study-based hemagglutinin (HA) gene of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1) detected from backyard chickens in Iran, 2015.

Authors:  Syed Ali Ghafouri; Arash Ghalyanchi Langeroudi; Hossein Maghsoudloo; Farshad Tehrani; Reza Khaltabadifarahani; Hamed Abdollahi; Mohammad Hossein Fallah
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 2.332

5.  A highly sensitive immuno-PCR assay for detection of H5N1 avian influenza virus.

Authors:  Ming Jun Deng; Xi Zhi Xiao; Yan Ming Zhang; Xin Hai Wu; Lai Hua Zhu; Xue Qian Xin; Dong Lai Wu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Rapid PCR-based molecular pathotyping of H5 and H7 avian influenza viruses.

Authors:  Mikael Leijon; Karin Ullman; Susanna Thyselius; Siamak Zohari; Janice C Pedersen; Amanda Hanna; Sahar Mahmood; Jill Banks; Marek J Slomka; Sándor Belák
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  A new clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza genotype detected in Europe in 2021.

Authors:  Alexander Nagy; Lenka Černíková; Martina Stará
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.574

8.  Ring test evaluation of the detection of influenza A virus in swine oral fluids by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and virus isolation.

Authors:  Christa K Goodell; Jianqiang Zhang; Erin Strait; Karen Harmon; Devi Patnayak; Tracy Otterson; Marie Culhane; Jane Christopher-Hennings; Travis Clement; Pamela Leslie-Steen; Richard Hesse; Joe Anderson; Kevin Skarbek; Amy Vincent; Pravina Kitikoon; Sabrina Swenson; Melinda Jenkins-Moore; Jodi McGill; Rolf Rauh; William Nelson; Catherine O'Connell; Rohan Shah; Chong Wang; Rodger Main; Jeffrey J Zimmerman
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.310

9.  Ducks as sentinels for avian influenza in wild birds.

Authors:  Anja Globig; Anette Baumer; Sandra Revilla-Fernández; Martin Beer; Eveline Wodak; Maria Fink; Norbert Greber; Timm C Harder; Hendrik Wilking; Iris Brunhart; Doris Matthes; Ulf Kraatz; Peter Strunk; Wolfgang Fiedler; Sasan R Fereidouni; Christoph Staubach; Franz J Conraths; Chris Griot; Thomas C Mettenleiter; Katharina D C Stärk
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Molecular Characterization of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses H5N6 Detected in Denmark in 2018-2019.

Authors:  Yuan Liang; Jesper Schak Krog; Pia Ryt-Hansen; Anders Gorm Pedersen; Lise Kirstine Kvisgaard; Elisabeth Holm; Pernille Dahl Nielsen; Anne Sofie Hammer; Jesper Johannes Madsen; Kasper Thorup; Lars Erik Larsen; Charlotte Kristiane Hjulsager
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.