Literature DB >> 17494511

Ki-67 proliferative index predicts clinical outcome in patients with atypical or anaplastic meningioma.

Jordi Bruna1, Marta Brell, Isidre Ferrer, Pepita Gimenez-Bonafe, Avelina Tortosa.   

Abstract

Meningiomas represent the second most common central nervous system neoplasms in adults and account for 26% of all primary brain tumors. Although most are benign, between 5% and 15% of meningiomas are atypical (grade II) whereas 1-2% are anaplastic meningiomas (grade III). Although histological grade is the most relevant prognostic factor, there are some unusual cases in which establishing a diagnosis of high-grade meningioma following 2000 World Health Organization (WHO) histological criteria is extremely difficult. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the predictive value of Ki-67 labeling index and its contribution to current WHO classification in predicting tumor recurrence and overall survival in patients with high-grade meningiomas. A total of 28 patients (with 16 atypical meningiomas and 12 anaplastic meningiomas) were evaluated for demographic, clinical, radiological and therapeutic variables, and for Ki-67 immunohistochemistry. Median Ki-67 labeling index in the whole series was 7.0 (0.5-31.5) with no differences with respect to the histological grade (P = 0.87). In the univariate analysis, Ki-67 labeling index and postoperative Karnofsky performance status were identified as significant prognostic factors of tumor recurrence and overall survival. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that Ki-67 labeling index is the only independent predictor of both tumor recurrence and overall survival. More importantly, this predictive value was maintained in both patients with atypical and patients with anaplastic meningioma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17494511     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2007.00750.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropathology        ISSN: 0919-6544            Impact factor:   1.906


  41 in total

1.  Expression of p40 (∆Np63) protein in meningiomas, an unexpected finding: immunohistochemical study and evaluation of its possible prognostic role.

Authors:  Elia Guadagno; Marialaura Del Basso De Caro; Sara Pignatiello; Concetta Sciammarella; Domenico Solari; Paolo Cappabianca; Francesco Maiuri; Flavia Dones
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Better see to better agree: phosphohistone H3 increases interobserver agreement in mitotic count for meningioma grading and imposes new specific thresholds.

Authors:  Eleonora Duregon; Adele Cassenti; Alessandra Pittaro; Laura Ventura; Rebecca Senetta; Roberta Rudà; Paola Cassoni
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  WHO grade II and III meningiomas: a study of prognostic factors.

Authors:  Anne Durand; François Labrousse; Anne Jouvet; Luc Bauchet; Michel Kalamaridès; Philippe Menei; Robert Deruty; Jean Jacques Moreau; Michelle Fèvre-Montange; Jacques Guyotat
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Pediatric meningioma: current approaches and future direction.

Authors:  Rishi S Kotecha; Reimar C Junckerstorff; Sharon Lee; Catherine H Cole; Nicholas G Gottardo
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Osteopontin expression is a valuable marker for prediction of short-term recurrence in WHO grade I benign meningiomas.

Authors:  Kuan-Yin Tseng; Min-Huey Chung; Huey-Kang Sytwu; Horng-Mo Lee; Kuan-Yu Chen; Chen Chang; Chih-Kung Lin; Che-Hung Yen; Jia-Hong Chen; Gu-Jiun Lin; Hsin-I Ma; Yi-Shian Yeh; Da-Tong Ju; Ming-Ying Liu; Dueng-Yuan Hueng
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  A review of malignant meningiomas: diagnosis, characteristics, and treatment.

Authors:  Simon Hanft; Peter Canoll; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Pediatric versus adult meningioma: comparison of epidemiology, treatments, and outcomes using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

Authors:  Roy W R Dudley; Michelle R Torok; Sarah Randall; Benjamin Béland; Michael H Handler; Jean M Mulcahy-Levy; Arthur K Liu; Todd C Hankinson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Atypical and malignant meningioma: outcome and prognostic factors in 68 irradiated patients.

Authors:  Beatrice Detti; Silvia Scoccianti; Vanessa Di Cataldo; Eleonora Monteleone; Samantha Cipressi; Lorenzo Bordi; Gianni Pellicanò; Davide Gadda; Calogero Saieva; Daniela Greto; Guido Pecchioli; Annamaria Buccoliero; Marco Ceroti; Franco Ammannati; Giampaolo Biti
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 9.  Meningioma Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Sajad Sahab-Negah; Ali Gorji
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Imaging and extent of surgical resection predict risk of meningioma recurrence better than WHO histopathological grade.

Authors:  William L Hwang; Ariel E Marciscano; Andrzej Niemierko; Daniel W Kim; Anat O Stemmer-Rachamimov; William T Curry; Fred G Barker; Robert L Martuza; Jay S Loeffler; Kevin S Oh; Helen A Shih; Mykol Larvie
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.