Literature DB >> 17494391

Coupling ecology and GIS to evaluate efficacy of marine protected areas in Hawaii.

Alan M Friedlander1, Eric K Brown, Mark E Monaco.   

Abstract

In order to properly determine the efficacy of marine protected areas (MPAs), a seascape perspective that integrates ecosystem elements at the appropriate ecological scale is necessary. Over the past four decades, Hawaii has developed a system of 11 Marine Life Conservation Districts (MLCDs) to conserve and replenish marine resources around the state. Initially established to provide opportunities for public interaction with the marine environment, these MLCDs vary in size, habitat quality, and management regimes, providing an excellent opportunity to test hypotheses concerning MPA design and function using multiple discrete sampling units. Digital benthic habitat maps for all MLCDs and adjacent habitats were used to evaluate the efficacy of existing MLCDs using a spatially explicit stratified random sampling design. Analysis of benthic cover validated the a priori classification of habitat types and provided justification for using these habitat strata to conduct stratified random sampling and analyses of fish habitat utilization patterns. Results showed that a number of fish assemblage characteristics (e.g., species richness, biomass, diversity) vary among habitat types, but were significantly higher in MLCDs compared with adjacent fished areas across all habitat types. Overall fish biomass was 2.6 times greater in the MLCDs compared to open areas. In addition, apex predators and other species were more abundant and larger in the MLCDs, illustrating the effectiveness of these closures in conserving fish populations within their boundaries. Habitat type, protected area size, and level of protection from fishing were all important determinates of MLCD effectiveness with respect to their associated fish assemblages. Although size of these protected areas was positively correlated with a number of fish assemblage characteristics, all appear too small to have any measurable influence on the adjacent fished areas. These protected areas were not designed for biodiversity conservation or fisheries enhancement yet still provide varying degrees of protection for fish populations within their boundaries. Implementing this type of biogeographic process, using remote sensing technology and sampling across the range of habitats present within the seascape, provides a robust evaluation of existing MPAs and can help to define ecologically relevant boundaries for future MPA design in a range of locations.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17494391     DOI: 10.1890/06-0536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  13 in total

1.  Incorporating biogeography into evaluations of the Channel Islands marine reserve network.

Authors:  Scott L Hamilton; Jennifer E Caselle; Dan P Malone; Mark H Carr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Predicting fish growth potential and identifying water quality constraints: a spatially-explicit bioenergetics approach.

Authors:  Phaedra Budy; Matthew Baker; Samuel K Dahle
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Untangling natural seascape variation from marine reserve effects using a landscape approach.

Authors:  Brittany E Huntington; Mandy Karnauskas; Elizabeth A Babcock; Diego Lirman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Impact of Submarine Groundwater Discharge on Marine Water Quality and Reef Biota of Maui.

Authors:  Daniel W Amato; James M Bishop; Craig R Glenn; Henrietta Dulai; Celia M Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Patterns in artisanal coral reef fisheries revealed through local monitoring efforts.

Authors:  David G Delaney; Lida T Teneva; Kostantinos A Stamoulis; Jonatha L Giddens; Haruko Koike; Tom Ogawa; Alan M Friedlander; John N Kittinger
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Comparison of coral reef ecosystems along a fishing pressure gradient.

Authors:  Mariska Weijerman; Elizabeth A Fulton; Frank A Parrish
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Marine protected area networks: assessing whether the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Kirsten Grorud-Colvert; Joachim Claudet; Brian N Tissot; Jennifer E Caselle; Mark H Carr; Jon C Day; Alan M Friedlander; Sarah E Lester; Thierry Lison de Loma; Daniel Malone; William J Walsh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessment of habitat representation across a network of marine protected areas with implications for the spatial design of monitoring.

Authors:  Mary Young; Mark Carr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Responses of Herbivorous Fishes and Benthos to 6 Years of Protection at the Kahekili Herbivore Fisheries Management Area, Maui.

Authors:  Ivor D Williams; Darla J White; Russell T Sparks; Kevin C Lino; Jill P Zamzow; Emily L A Kelly; Hailey L Ramey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hydroacoustics as a tool to examine the effects of Marine Protected Areas and habitat type on marine fish communities.

Authors:  J P Egerton; A F Johnson; J Turner; L LeVay; I Mascareñas-Osorio; O Aburto-Oropeza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.