Literature DB >> 17494028

Rates of genome evolution and branching order from whole genome analysis.

Gavin A Huttley1, Matthew J Wakefield, Simon Easteal.   

Abstract

Accurate estimation of any phylogeny is important as a framework for evolutionary analysis of form and function at all levels of organization from sequence to whole organism. Using alignments of nonrepetitive components of opossum, human, mouse, rat, and dog genomes we evaluated two alternative tree topologies for eutherian evolution. We show with very high confidence that there is a basal split between rodents (as represented by the mouse and rat) and a branch joining primates (as represented by humans) and carnivores (as represented by dogs), consistent with some but not the most widely accepted mammalian phylogenies. The result was robust to substitution model choice with equivalent inference returned from a spectrum of models ranging from a general time reversible model, a model that treated nucleotides as either purines and pyrimidines, and variants of these that incorporated rate heterogeneity among sites. By determining this particular branching order we are able to show that the rate of molecular evolution is almost identical in rodent and carnivore lineages and that sequences evolve approximately 11%-14% faster in these lineages than in the primate lineage. In addition by applying the chicken as outgroup the analyses suggested that the rate of evolution in all eutherian lineages is approximately 30% slower than in the opossum lineage. This pattern of relative rates is inconsistent with the hypothesis that generation time is an important determinant of substitution rates and, by implication, mutation rates. Possible factors causing rate differences between the lineages include differences in DNA repair and replication enzymology, and shifts in nucleotide pools. Our analysis demonstrates the importance of using multiple sequences from across the genome to estimate phylogeny and relative evolutionary rate in order to reduce the influence of distorting local effects evident even in relatively long sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17494028     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  23 in total

1.  Methods for incorporating the hypermutability of CpG dinucleotides in detecting natural selection operating at the amino acid sequence level.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Suzuki; Takashi Gojobori; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 2.  Breaking bad: The mutagenic effect of DNA repair.

Authors:  Jia Chen; Anthony V Furano
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-05-01

3.  The Dynamics, Causes, and Impacts of Mammalian Evolutionary Rates Revealed by the Analyses of Capybara Draft Genome Sequences.

Authors:  Isaac Adeyemi Babarinde; Naruya Saitou
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.416

4.  Breakpoint graphs and ancestral genome reconstructions.

Authors:  Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  An application of supertree methods to Mammalian mitogenomic sequences.

Authors:  Véronique Campbell; François-Joseph Lapointe
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 1.625

6.  Genomics, biogeography, and the diversification of placental mammals.

Authors:  Derek E Wildman; Monica Uddin; Juan C Opazo; Guozhen Liu; Vincent Lefort; Stephane Guindon; Olivier Gascuel; Lawrence I Grossman; Roberto Romero; Morris Goodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Phylogenetic analysis of genome rearrangements among five mammalian orders.

Authors:  Haiwei Luo; William Arndt; Yiwei Zhang; Guanqun Shi; Max A Alekseyev; Jijun Tang; Austin L Hughes; Robert Friedman
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  Evolutionary insights into the unique electromotility motor of mammalian outer hair cells.

Authors:  Oseremen E Okoruwa; Michael D Weston; Divvya C Sanjeevi; Amanda R Millemon; Bernd Fritzsch; Richard Hallworth; Kirk W Beisel
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  How fast is the sessile ciona?

Authors:  Luisa Berná; Fernando Alvarez-Valin; Giuseppe D'Onofrio
Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics       Date:  2009-12-16

10.  Survey of microsatellite clustering in eight fully sequenced species sheds light on the origin of compound microsatellites.

Authors:  Robert Kofler; Christian Schlötterer; Evita Luschützky; Tamas Lelley
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.