Literature DB >> 17493955

Measuring the severity of upper gastrointestinal complaints: does GP assessment correspond with patients' self-assessment?

G A J Fransen1, M J R Janssen, J W M Muris, I Mesters, J A Knottnerus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Questionnaires are frequently used to measure the severity of gastrointestinal (GI) complaints. These questionnaires can either be filled out by the physicians or by the patients, but it is not clear whether these scores correspond. This study aimed to investigate the interrater agreement between physician-reported severity and patient-reported severity concerning the patients' upper GI complaints.
METHODS: In a prospective observational study, the severity of eight GI complaints was registered by both patients and GPs independently on a seven-point scale (n = 316) before and after treatment with esomeprazole. Weighted kappa values for the agreement on the severity and simple kappa values for the agreement on the absence or presence of symptoms were calculated.
RESULTS: The weighted kappa values ranged from 0.14 to 0.68 indicating poor to moderate agreement. The agreement on the presence or absence of symptoms was similar. Several systematic differences in scoring were found: the GPs tended to underestimate the severity of belching, nausea, early satiety, vomiting and upper and lower abdominal pain. Furthermore, the treatment effect for belching and lower abdominal pain was more often overestimated, while the treatment effect for nausea was more often underestimated by the GP.
CONCLUSION: The agreement between GP and patient is low. The differences in scoring should be kept in mind when comparing physician-reported outcomes with patient-reported outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17493955     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmm011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Upper abdominal pain: a frequent and multifaceted leading symptom in primary care internal medicine].

Authors:  G Fröhlich; H Fröhlich
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Management of gastrointestinal symptoms in advanced cancer patients: the rapid learning cancer clinic model.

Authors:  Amy P Abernethy; Jane L Wheeler; S Yousuf Zafar
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.302

3.  Electronic patient self-assessment and management (SAM): a novel framework for cancer survivorship.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Talya Salz; Ethan Basch; Matthew R Cooperberg; Peter R Carroll; Foss Tighe; James Eastham; Raymond C Rosen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  The risk of oesophago-gastric cancer in symptomatic patients in primary care: a large case-control study using electronic records.

Authors:  S Stapley; T J Peters; R D Neal; P W Rose; F M Walter; W Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Pragmatic trials in primary care. Methodological challenges and solutions demonstrated by the DIAMOND-study.

Authors:  Gerdine A J Fransen; Corine J van Marrewijk; Suhreta Mujakovic; Jean W M Muris; Robert J F Laheij; Mattijs E Numans; Niek J de Wit; Melvin Samsom; Jan B M J Jansen; J André Knottnerus
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 4.615

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.