Literature DB >> 17493864

Predicting soft tissue deformations for a maxillofacial surgery planning system: from computational strategies to a complete clinical validation.

W Mollemans1, F Schutyser, N Nadjmi, F Maes, P Suetens.   

Abstract

In the field of maxillofacial surgery, there is a huge demand from surgeons to be able to pre-operatively predict the new facial outlook after surgery. Besides the big interest for the surgeon during the planning, it is also an essential tool to improve the communication between the surgeon and his patient. In this work, we compare the usage of four different computational strategies to predict this new facial outlook. These four strategies are: a linear Finite Element Model (FEM), a non-linear Finite Element Model (NFEM), a Mass Spring Model (MSM) and a novel Mass Tensor Model (MTM). For true validation of these four models we acquired a data set of 10 patients who underwent maxillofacial surgery, including pre-operative and post-operative CT data. For all patient data we compared in a quantitative validation the predicted facial outlook, obtained with one of the four computational models, with post-operative image data. During this quantitative validation distance measurements between corresponding points of the predicted and the actual post-operative facial skin surface, are quantified and visualised in 3D. Our results show that the MTM and linear FEM predictions achieve the highest accuracy. For these models the average median distance measures only 0.60 mm and even the average 90% percentile stays below 1.5 mm. Furthermore, the MTM turned out to be the fastest model, with an average simulation time of only 10 s. Besides this quantitative validation, a qualitative validation study was carried out by eight maxillofacial surgeons, who scored the visualised predicted facial appearance by means of pre-defined statements. This study confirmed the positive results of the quantitative study, so we can conclude that fast and accurate predictions of the post-operative facial outcome are possible. Therefore, the usage of a maxillofacial soft tissue prediction system is relevant and suitable for daily clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17493864     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2007.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  30 in total

Review 1.  Maxillofacial surgery simulation using a mass-spring model derived from continuum and the scaled displacement method.

Authors:  G San Vicente; C Buchart; D Borro; J T Celigüeta
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  An improved finite element model for craniofacial surgery simulation.

Authors:  Shengzheng Wang; Jie Yang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Implementation and validation of constitutive relations for human dermis mechanical response.

Authors:  Alessandra Aldieri; Mara Terzini; Cristina Bignardi; Elisabetta M Zanetti; Alberto L Audenino
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Comparison of actual surgical outcomes and 3-dimensional surgical simulations.

Authors:  Scott Tucker; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Martin Styner; Hyungmin Kim; Mauricio Reyes; William Proffit; Timothy Turvey
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  An eFace-Template Method for Efficiently Generating Patient-Specific Anatomically-Detailed Facial Soft Tissue FE Models for Craniomaxillofacial Surgery Simulation.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Zhang; Zhen Tang; Michael A K Liebschner; Daeseung Kim; Shunyao Shen; Chien-Ming Chang; Peng Yuan; Guangming Zhang; Jaime Gateno; Xiaobo Zhou; Shao-Xiang Zhang; James J Xia
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Three-dimensional surgical simulation.

Authors:  Lucia H C Cevidanes; Scott Tucker; Martin Styner; Hyungmin Kim; Jonas Chapuis; Mauricio Reyes; William Proffit; Timothy Turvey; Michael Jaskolka
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Design, development and clinical validation of computer-aided surgical simulation system for streamlined orthognathic surgical planning.

Authors:  Peng Yuan; Huaming Mai; Jianfu Li; Dennis Chun-Yu Ho; Yingying Lai; Siting Liu; Daeseung Kim; Zixiang Xiong; David M Alfi; John F Teichgraeber; Jaime Gateno; James J Xia
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Incremental kernel ridge regression for the prediction of soft tissue deformations.

Authors:  Binbin Pan; James J Xia; Peng Yuan; Jaime Gateno; Horace H S Ip; Qizhen He; Philip K M Lee; Ben Chow; Xiaobo Zhou
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2012

9.  3D virtual planning in orthognathic surgery and CAD/CAM surgical splints generation in one patient with craniofacial microsomia: a case report.

Authors:  Francisco Vale; Jessica Scherzberg; João Cavaleiro; David Sanz; Francisco Caramelo; Luísa Maló; João Pedro Marcelino
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

10.  Cephalometric methods of prediction in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Olga-Elpis Kolokitha; Nikolaos Topouzelis
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.