Literature DB >> 17493766

Oxygen breathing may be a cheaper and safer alternative to exogenous erythropoietin (EPO).

R Burk1.   

Abstract

Erythropoietin (EPO) is a glycoprotein hormone produced by renal tissue in response to hypoxia; EPO functions as a cytokine to precursor cells produced by the bone marrow, stimulating red blood cell production. Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) are manufactured molecules designed to mimic the ability of endogenous EPO to bind to EPO receptors and increase red blood cell production. To achieve desired dosing schedules and avoid the need for blood transfusions, oncologists have become increasingly reliant on ESAs to counter the anemia often experienced during chemotherapy. In recent years, significant concerns have been raised about the safety of ESAs, including the possibility of increased cardiovascular events and even increased tumor growth and accelerated mortality in cancer patients. ESAs also contribute significantly to the expense of chemotherapy, rendering them unavailable to some patients and available to others only upon achieving insurance-mandated levels of anemia. A recently discovered "normobaric oxygen paradox" demonstrates that renal tissue can be stimulated to increase EPO production via a simple pattern of oxygen breathing at normal atmospheric pressures. This leads directly to the hypothesis that oxygen breathing may provide chemotherapy patients with a convenient and inexpensive alternative to ESAs. Stimulating endogenous EPO production eliminates the small risk of immune system reaction associated with ESAs. Further, the endogenous physiological EPO doses provided by this method may be safer, in terms of cancer mortality, than the exogenous pharmacological doses inherent in ESA administration. A single patient test case is presented to support the hypothesis that normobaric oxygen breathing can be an effective replacement for ESAs in treating chemotherapy-induced anemia. In this case, a stage III breast cancer patient undergoing dose-dense AC+T chemotherapy obtained a clear response equivalent to ESA treatment by using a pattern of simple oxygen breathing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17493766     DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2007.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


  7 in total

1.  Hypoxia, a multifaceted phenomenon: the example of the "normobaric oxygen paradox".

Authors:  C Balestra; P Germonpré
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Prevailing evidence contradicts the notion of a "normobaric oxygen paradox".

Authors:  Michail E Keramidas; Ola Eiken; Igor B Mekjavic
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  EPO and doping.

Authors:  Costantino Balestra; Peter Germonpré
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Acute short-term hyperoxia followed by mild hypoxia does not increase EPO production: resolving the "normobaric oxygen paradox".

Authors:  Tadej Debevec; Michail E Keramidas; Barbara Norman; Thomas Gustafsson; Ola Eiken; Igor B Mekjavic
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Effect of N-acetyl-cysteine and hyperoxia on erythropoietin production.

Authors:  Mona Momeni; Marc De Kock; Olivier Devuyst; Giuseppe Liistro
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Increasing Oxygen Partial Pressures Induce a Distinct Transcriptional Response in Human PBMC: A Pilot Study on the "Normobaric Oxygen Paradox".

Authors:  Deborah Fratantonio; Fabio Virgili; Alessandro Zucchi; Kate Lambrechts; Tiziana Latronico; Pierre Lafère; Peter Germonpré; Costantino Balestra
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Varying Oxygen Partial Pressure Elicits Blood-Borne Microparticles Expressing Different Cell-Specific Proteins-Toward a Targeted Use of Oxygen?

Authors:  Costantino Balestra; Awadhesh K Arya; Clément Leveque; Fabio Virgili; Peter Germonpré; Kate Lambrechts; Pierre Lafère; Stephen R Thom
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 6.208

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.