Literature DB >> 17493723

How do patients expect the mental health service system to act? Testing the WHO responsiveness concept for its appropriateness in mental health care.

Anke Bramesfeld1, Ulrike Klippel, Gabriele Seidel, Friedrich W Schwartz, Marie-Luise Dierks.   

Abstract

The World Health Organisation (WHO) concept of responsiveness has been defined as a measure of how well the health system responds to the population's legitimate expectations of non-health aspects of health care provision. It comprises eight domains: dignity, prompt attention, autonomy, choice of health care provider, clear communication, confidentiality, quality of basic amenities, and access to social support networks. The concept is of particular relevance to mental health care systems because of the specific dependency and vulnerability of their users. We tested its applicability to mental health care with five focus groups of experienced mental health care users in Hannover, Germany. The focus groups revealed 492 statements about users' expectations in mental health care. Most concerned attention (115), dignity (108) and autonomy (86). The quotations were assigned to the eight responsiveness domains. In addition, the domain of prompt attention was extended and renamed attention, and the new domain continuity was created. The findings correspond with the literature on health care expectations of non-mental health patients, but differ slightly from the results of a WHO study on overall health care responsiveness. The need for widening the concept of continuity and extending the attention domain reflects the nature of mental health care of providing predominately long-term care. Our analysis indicates the feasibility of the responsiveness concept (if altered as proposed) as a tool for assessing the quality of mental health service from the users' point of view. It should also be further developed to quantitatively evaluate mental health care systems and to benchmark system performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17493723     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  23 in total

1.  Quality assessment of mental health care by people with severe mental disorders: a participatory research project.

Authors:  Angelo Barbato; Alessia Bajoni; Filippo Rapisarda; Vito D'Anza; Luigi Fabrizio De Luca; Cristiana Inglese; Sonia Iapichino; Fabrizio Mauriello; Barbara D'Avanzo
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2013-12-08

Review 2.  Interventions to mitigate the effects of poverty and inequality on mental health.

Authors:  Kristian Wahlbeck; Johanna Cresswell-Smith; Peija Haaramo; Johannes Parkkonen
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  A critical assessment of the WHO responsiveness tool: lessons from voluntary HIV testing and counselling services in Kenya.

Authors:  Mercy K Njeru; Astrid Blystad; Isaac K Nyamongo; Knut Fylkesnes
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Assessing the performance of mental health service facilities for meeting patient priorities and health service responsiveness.

Authors:  A Bramesfeld; C Stegbauer
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 6.892

5.  Testing the WHO responsiveness concept in the Iranian mental healthcare system: a qualitative study of service users.

Authors:  Ameneh Setareh Forouzan; Mehdi Ghazinour; Masoumeh Dejman; Hassan Rafeiey; Miguel San Sebastian
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Service Users and Providers Expectations of Mental Health Care in Iran: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Ameneh Setareh Forouzan; Mehdi Ghazinour; Masoumeh Dejman; Hassan Rafeiey; Monir Baradaran Eftekhari; Miguel San Sebastian
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.429

7.  Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders.

Authors:  David J Dausey; Harold A Pincus; James M Herrell
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2009-10-14

8.  How does mental health care perform in respect to service users' expectations? Evaluating inpatient and outpatient care in Germany with the WHO responsiveness concept.

Authors:  Anke Bramesfeld; Felix Wedegärtner; Hermann Elgeti; Susanne Bisson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Determinants of patient-reported experience of cancer services responsiveness.

Authors:  Dominique Tremblay; Danièle Roberge; Djamal Berbiche
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  Systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to service user-led care planning.

Authors:  Penny Bee; Owen Price; John Baker; Karina Lovell
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 9.319

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.