Literature DB >> 17493309

United Kingdom cervical cancer screening and the costs of time and travel.

Claire Woolley1, Zoë Philips, David K Whynes, Seonaidh C Cotton, Nicola M Gray, Linda Sharp, Julian Little, Norman R Waugh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to estimate the time and travel costs generated by women when attending for Papanicolaou (Pap) smear tests or colposcopy appointments in the United Kingdom, both absolutely and relative to the health service cost of the national cervical cancer screening programs.
METHODS: Data were obtained from questionnaires completed by two samples of women participating in a three-center trial of management of low-grade abnormalities detected by screening (n = 1,106 for Pap smears and n = 1,203 for colposcopy appointments). Women were 20 to 59 years of age and resident in Grampian or Tayside, Scotland, or Nottingham, England. Questionnaire data were supplemented with sociodemographic information previously collected at the time of recruitment to the trial.
RESULTS: The mean total time and travel costs per attendance at a smear test and at a colposcopy appointment were estimated to be 9.2 pounds and 27.4 pounds, respectively, averaged across the three trial areas (valued at 2002 prices). Statistically significant intercenter disparities in time and travel costs were identified, particularly with respect to colposcopy appointments. For these, time and travel costs in Nottingham were substantially less than those in Grampian and Tayside (22.9 pounds, 30.2 pounds, and 32.1 pounds, respectively). Time and travel costs amount to 26 and 33 percent, approximately, over and above the direct health service costs of the English and Scottish screening programs, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The time and travel costs associated with participation in the UK cervical cancer screening programs are substantial and are not spatially uniform across the country.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17493309     DOI: 10.1017/S026646230707016X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  8 in total

1.  Biopsy and selective recall compared with immediate large loop excision in management of women with low grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28

2.  Barriers to and facilitators of compliance with clinic-based cervical cancer screening: population-based cohort study of women aged 23-60 years.

Authors:  Ellinor Östensson; Susanna Alder; K Miriam Elfström; Karin Sundström; Niklas Zethraeus; Marc Arbyn; Sonia Andersson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Psychosocial impact of alternative management policies for low-grade cervical abnormalities: results from the TOMBOLA randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Linda Sharp; Seonaidh Cotton; Julian Little; Nicola M Gray; Margaret Cruickshank; Louise Smart; Alison Thornton; Norman Waugh; Leslie Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The impact of car ownership and public transport usage on cancer screening coverage: Empirical evidence using a spatial analysis in England.

Authors:  Chao Wang
Journal:  J Transp Geogr       Date:  2016-10

5.  Modeling patients' time, travel, and monitoring costs in anticoagulation management: societal savings achievable with the shift from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Aapeli Leminen; Mikko Pyykönen; Juho Tynkkynen; Markku Tykkyläinen; Tiina Laatikainen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Options for managing low grade cervical abnormalities detected at screening: cost effectiveness study.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28

7.  Contact frequency, travel time, and travel costs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Jan Sørensen; Louise Linde; Merete Lund Hetland
Journal:  Int J Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02-17

8.  Influencing Factors of Transportation Costs Regarding Healthcare Service Utilization in Korea.

Authors:  Su Yeon Jang; Jeong Yeon Seon; In Hwan Oh
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.153

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.