Literature DB >> 17492525

A review of the toxicology of acrylamide.

J H Exon1.   

Abstract

Acrylamide (ACR) is a chemical used in many industries around the world and more recently was found to form naturally in foods cooked at high temperatures. Acrylamide was shown to be a neurotoxicant, reproductive toxicant, and carcinogen in animal species. Only the neurotoxic effects were observed in humans and only at high levels of exposure in occupational settings. The mechanism underlying neurotoxic effects of ACR may be basic to the other toxic effects seen in animals. This mechanism involves interference with the kinesin-related motor proteins in nerve cells or with fusion proteins in the formation of vesicles at the nerve terminus and eventual cell death. Neurotoxicity and resulting behavioral changes can affect reproductive performance of ACR-exposed laboratory animals with resulting decreased reproductive performance. Further, the kinesin motor proteins are important in sperm motility, which could alter reproduction parameters. Effects on kinesin proteins could also explain some of the genotoxic effects on ACR. These proteins form the spindle fibers in the nucleus that function in the separation of chromosomes during cell division. This could explain the clastogenic effects of the chemical noted in a number of tests for genotoxicity and assays for germ cell damage. Other mechanisms underlying ACR-induced carcinogenesis or nerve toxicity are likely related to an affinity for sulfhydryl groups on proteins. Binding of the sulfhydryl groups could inactive proteins/enzymes involved in DNA repair and other critical cell functions. Direct interaction with DNA may or may not be a major mechanism for cancer induction in animals. The DNA adducts that form do not correlate with tumor sites and ACR is mostly negative in gene mutation assays except at high doses that may not be achievable in the diet. All epidemiologic studies fail to show any increased risk of cancer from either high-level occupational exposure or the low levels found in the diet. In fact, two of the epidemiologic studies show a decrease in cancer of the large bowel. A number of risk assessment studies were performed to estimate increased cancer risk. The results of these studies are highly variable depending on the model. There is universal consensus among international food safety groups in all countries that examined the issue of ACR in the diet that not enough information is available at this time to make informed decisions on which to base any regulatory action. Too little is known about levels of this chemical in different foods and the potential risk from dietary exposure. Avoidance of foods containing ACR would result in worse health issues from an unbalanced diet or pathogens from under cooked foods. There is some consensus that low levels of ACR in the diet are not a concern for neurotoxicity or reproductive toxicity in humans, although further research is need to study the long-term, low-level cumulative effects on the nervous system. Any relationship to cancer risk from dietary exposure is hypothetical at this point and awaits more definitive studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17492525     DOI: 10.1080/10937400600681430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev        ISSN: 1093-7404            Impact factor:   6.393


  34 in total

Review 1.  Causes of genome instability: the effect of low dose chemical exposures in modern society.

Authors:  Sabine A S Langie; Gudrun Koppen; Daniel Desaulniers; Fahd Al-Mulla; Rabeah Al-Temaimi; Amedeo Amedei; Amaya Azqueta; William H Bisson; Dustin G Brown; Gunnar Brunborg; Amelia K Charles; Tao Chen; Annamaria Colacci; Firouz Darroudi; Stefano Forte; Laetitia Gonzalez; Roslida A Hamid; Lisbeth E Knudsen; Luc Leyns; Adela Lopez de Cerain Salsamendi; Lorenzo Memeo; Chiara Mondello; Carmel Mothersill; Ann-Karin Olsen; Sofia Pavanello; Jayadev Raju; Emilio Rojas; Rabindra Roy; Elizabeth P Ryan; Patricia Ostrosky-Wegman; Hosni K Salem; A Ivana Scovassi; Neetu Singh; Monica Vaccari; Frederik J Van Schooten; Mahara Valverde; Jordan Woodrick; Luoping Zhang; Nik van Larebeke; Micheline Kirsch-Volders; Andrew R Collins
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Effective suppression of acrylamide neurotoxicity by lithium in mouse.

Authors:  Lingzhen Song; Jiutao Wang; Wei Zhang; Runchuan Yan; Xinde Hu; Shulin Chen; Shanting Zhao
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 3.  Assessing the carcinogenic potential of low-dose exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment: the challenge ahead.

Authors:  William H Goodson; Leroy Lowe; David O Carpenter; Michael Gilbertson; Abdul Manaf Ali; Adela Lopez de Cerain Salsamendi; Ahmed Lasfar; Amancio Carnero; Amaya Azqueta; Amedeo Amedei; Amelia K Charles; Andrew R Collins; Andrew Ward; Anna C Salzberg; Annamaria Colacci; Ann-Karin Olsen; Arthur Berg; Barry J Barclay; Binhua P Zhou; Carmen Blanco-Aparicio; Carolyn J Baglole; Chenfang Dong; Chiara Mondello; Chia-Wen Hsu; Christian C Naus; Clement Yedjou; Colleen S Curran; Dale W Laird; Daniel C Koch; Danielle J Carlin; Dean W Felsher; Debasish Roy; Dustin G Brown; Edward Ratovitski; Elizabeth P Ryan; Emanuela Corsini; Emilio Rojas; Eun-Yi Moon; Ezio Laconi; Fabio Marongiu; Fahd Al-Mulla; Ferdinando Chiaradonna; Firouz Darroudi; Francis L Martin; Frederik J Van Schooten; Gary S Goldberg; Gerard Wagemaker; Gladys N Nangami; Gloria M Calaf; Graeme Williams; Gregory T Wolf; Gudrun Koppen; Gunnar Brunborg; H Kim Lyerly; Harini Krishnan; Hasiah Ab Hamid; Hemad Yasaei; Hideko Sone; Hiroshi Kondoh; Hosni K Salem; Hsue-Yin Hsu; Hyun Ho Park; Igor Koturbash; Isabelle R Miousse; A Ivana Scovassi; James E Klaunig; Jan Vondráček; Jayadev Raju; Jesse Roman; John Pierce Wise; Jonathan R Whitfield; Jordan Woodrick; Joseph A Christopher; Josiah Ochieng; Juan Fernando Martinez-Leal; Judith Weisz; Julia Kravchenko; Jun Sun; Kalan R Prudhomme; Kannan Badri Narayanan; Karine A Cohen-Solal; Kim Moorwood; Laetitia Gonzalez; Laura Soucek; Le Jian; Leandro S D'Abronzo; Liang-Tzung Lin; Lin Li; Linda Gulliver; Lisa J McCawley; Lorenzo Memeo; Louis Vermeulen; Luc Leyns; Luoping Zhang; Mahara Valverde; Mahin Khatami; Maria Fiammetta Romano; Marion Chapellier; Marc A Williams; Mark Wade; Masoud H Manjili; Matilde E Lleonart; Menghang Xia; Michael J Gonzalez; Michalis V Karamouzis; Micheline Kirsch-Volders; Monica Vaccari; Nancy B Kuemmerle; Neetu Singh; Nichola Cruickshanks; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Nik van Larebeke; Nuzhat Ahmed; Olugbemiga Ogunkua; P K Krishnakumar; Pankaj Vadgama; Paola A Marignani; Paramita M Ghosh; Patricia Ostrosky-Wegman; Patricia A Thompson; Paul Dent; Petr Heneberg; Philippa Darbre; Po Sing Leung; Pratima Nangia-Makker; Qiang Shawn Cheng; R Brooks Robey; Rabeah Al-Temaimi; Rabindra Roy; Rafaela Andrade-Vieira; Ranjeet K Sinha; Rekha Mehta; Renza Vento; Riccardo Di Fiore; Richard Ponce-Cusi; Rita Dornetshuber-Fleiss; Rita Nahta; Robert C Castellino; Roberta Palorini; Roslida Abd Hamid; Sabine A S Langie; Sakina E Eltom; Samira A Brooks; Sandra Ryeom; Sandra S Wise; Sarah N Bay; Shelley A Harris; Silvana Papagerakis; Simona Romano; Sofia Pavanello; Staffan Eriksson; Stefano Forte; Stephanie C Casey; Sudjit Luanpitpong; Tae-Jin Lee; Takemi Otsuki; Tao Chen; Thierry Massfelder; Thomas Sanderson; Tiziana Guarnieri; Tove Hultman; Valérian Dormoy; Valerie Odero-Marah; Venkata Sabbisetti; Veronique Maguer-Satta; W Kimryn Rathmell; Wilhelm Engström; William K Decker; William H Bisson; Yon Rojanasakul; Yunus Luqmani; Zhenbang Chen; Zhiwei Hu
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 4.  Optimal Environmental Stiffness for Stem Cell Mediated Ischemic Myocardium Repair.

Authors:  Honghai Liu; Christian Paul; Meifeng Xu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

5.  Single-cell ELISA and flow cytometry as methods for highlighting potential neuronal and astrocytic toxicant specificity.

Authors:  E K Woehrling; E J Hill; E E Torr; M D Coleman
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.911

6.  Exposure of the U.S. population to acrylamide in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2004.

Authors:  Hubert W Vesper; Samuel P Caudill; John D Osterloh; Tunde Meyers; Deanna Scott; Gary L Myers
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Comparative neurotoxicity screening in human iPSC-derived neural stem cells, neurons and astrocytes.

Authors:  Ying Pei; Jun Peng; Mamta Behl; Nisha S Sipes; Keith R Shockley; Mahendra S Rao; Raymond R Tice; Xianmin Zeng
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Synthesis of di- and triacrylamides with tertiary amine cores and their evaluation as monomers in dental adhesive interfaces.

Authors:  A P P Fugolin; Oscar Navarro; Matthew G Logan; Vincent Huynh; Cristiane M França; Jack L Ferracane; Carmem S Pfeifer
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Performance and biocompatibility of extremely tough alginate/polyacrylamide hydrogels.

Authors:  Max C Darnell; Jeong-Yun Sun; Manav Mehta; Christopher Johnson; Praveen R Arany; Zhigang Suo; David J Mooney
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Associations between dietary acrylamide intake and plasma sex hormone levels.

Authors:  Janneke G Hogervorst; Renee T Fortner; Lorelei A Mucci; Shelley S Tworoger; A Heather Eliassen; Susan E Hankinson; Kathryn M Wilson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.