Literature DB >> 17492484

Remediation aspect of microbial changes of plant rhizosphere in mercury contaminated soil.

Aleksandra Sas-Nowosielska1, Regina Galimska-Stypa, Rafał Kucharski, Urszula Zielonka, Eugeniusz Małkowski, Laymon Gray.   

Abstract

Phytoremediation, an approach that uses plants to remediate contaminated soil through degradation, stabilization or accumulation, may provide an efficient solution to some mercury contamination problems. This paper presents growth chamber experiments that tested the ability of plant species to stabilize mercury in soil. Several indigenous herbaceous species and Salix viminalis were grown in soil collected from a mercury-contaminated site in southern Poland. The uptake and distribution of mercury by these plants were investigated, and the growth and vitality of the plants through a part of one vegetative cycle were assessed. The highest concentrations of mercury were found at the roots, but translocation to the aerial part also occurred. Most of the plant species tested displayed good growth on mercury contaminated soil and sustained a rich microbial population in the rhizosphere. The microbial populations of root-free soil and rhizosphere soil from all species were also examined. An inverse correlation between the number of sulfur amino acid decomposing bacteria and root mercury content was observed. These results indicate the potential for using some species of plants to treat mercury contaminated soil through stabilization rather than extraction. The present investigation proposes a practical cost-effective temporary solution for phytostabilization of soil with moderate mercury contamination as well as the basis for plant selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17492484     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9732-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  10 in total

Review 1.  The role of aquaporins in cellular and whole plant water balance.

Authors:  I Johansson; M Karlsson; U Johanson; C Larsson; P Kjellbom
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2000-05-01

2.  A mathematical model of "plants-microorganisms" interaction on complete mineral medium and under nitrogen limitation.

Authors:  T I Pisman; N S Pechurkin; T S Mariasova; L A Somova; A B Sarangova
Journal:  Adv Space Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.152

Review 3.  How plants communicate using the underground information superhighway.

Authors:  Harsh Pal Bais; Sang-Wook Park; Tiffany L Weir; Ragan M Callaway; Jorge M Vivanco
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 4.  Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems.

Authors:  Tamar Barkay; Susan M Miller; Anne O Summers
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 16.408

5.  Medium for the selective isolation of members of the genus Pseudomonas from natural habitats.

Authors:  M A Grant; J G Holt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Estimating distribution and retention of mercury in three different soils contaminated by emissions from chlor-alkali plants: part I.

Authors:  H Biester; G Müller; H F Schöler
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2002-02-04       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Mercury volatilisation and phytoextraction from base-metal mine tailings.

Authors:  Fabio N Moreno; Chris W N Anderson; Robert B Stewart; Brett H Robinson
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 8.  Ecological effects, transport, and fate of mercury: a general review.

Authors:  D W Boening
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 9.  Bacterial resistances to toxic metal ions--a review.

Authors:  S Silver
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1996-11-07       Impact factor: 3.688

10.  Mercury inhibition at the donor side of photosystem II is reversed by chloride.

Authors:  M Bernier; R Popovic; R Carpentier
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1993-04-19       Impact factor: 4.124

  10 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  In situ remediation technologies for mercury-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Feng He; Jie Gao; Eric Pierce; P J Strong; Hailong Wang; Liyuan Liang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Using X-ray microscopy and Hg L3 XANES to study Hg binding in the rhizosphere of Spartina cordgrass.

Authors:  Cynthia Patty; Brandy Barnett; Bridget Mooney; Amanda Kahn; Silvio Levy; Yijin Liu; Piero Pianetta; Joy C Andrews
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Distribution and sources of mercury in soils from former industrialized urban areas of Beijing, China.

Authors:  Wei Luo; Yonglong Lu; Bin Wang; Xiaojuan Tong; Guang Wang; Yajuan Shi; Tieyu Wang; John P Giesy
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Seasonal Variations of Mercury Levels in Selected Medicinal Plants Originating from Poland.

Authors:  M Ordak; M Wesolowski; I Radecka; E Muszynska; M Bujalska-Zazdrozny
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 5.  Phytoremediation: A Promising Approach for Revegetation of Heavy Metal-Polluted Land.

Authors:  An Yan; Yamin Wang; Swee Ngin Tan; Mohamed Lokman Mohd Yusof; Subhadip Ghosh; Zhong Chen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Heavy Metal-Resistant Filamentous Fungi as Potential Mercury Bioremediators.

Authors:  Cristina L Văcar; Enikö Covaci; Somsubhra Chakraborty; Bin Li; David C Weindorf; Tiberiu Frențiu; Marcel Pârvu; Dorina Podar
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14

Review 7.  Phytoremediation and Microorganisms-Assisted Phytoremediation of Mercury-Contaminated Soils: Challenges and Perspectives.

Authors:  Emanuela D Tiodar; Cristina L Văcar; Dorina Podar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.