OBJECTIVE: To compare the healing pattern of osteoid osteomas on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after successful and unsuccessful thermocoagulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients were examined by CT and 18 patients by dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MRI before and after thermocoagulation for osteoid osteoma. Thermocoagulation was successful in 73% (63/86) and unsuccessful in 27% (23/86) of patients followed by CT. Thermocoagulation was successful in 72% (13/18) of patients followed by MRI. After treatment, the healing of the nidus on CT was evaluated using different healing patterns (complete ossification, minimal nidus rest, decreased size, unchanged size or thermonecrosis). On MRI the presence of reactive changes (joint effusion, "oedema-like" changes of bone marrow and soft tissue oedema) and the delay time (between arterial and nidus enhancement) were assessed and compared before and after thermocoagulation. RESULTS: Complete ossification or a minimal nidus rest was observed on CT in 58% (16/28) of treatment successes (with > 12 months follow-up), but not in treatment failures. "Oedema-like" changes of bone marrow and/or soft tissue oedema were seen on MR in all patients before thermocoagulation and in all treatment failures. However, residual "oedema-like" changes of bone marrow were also found in 69% (9/13) of treatment successes. An increased delay time was observed in 62% (8/13) of treatment successes and in 1/5 of treatment failures. CONCLUSION: Complete, or almost complete, ossification of the treated nidus on CT correlated with successful treatment. Absence of this ossification pattern, however, did not correlate with treatment failure. CT could not be used to identify the activity of the nidus following treatment. The value of MR parameters to assess residual activity of the nidus was limited in this study.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the healing pattern of osteoid osteomas on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after successful and unsuccessful thermocoagulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients were examined by CT and 18 patients by dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MRI before and after thermocoagulation for osteoid osteoma. Thermocoagulation was successful in 73% (63/86) and unsuccessful in 27% (23/86) of patients followed by CT. Thermocoagulation was successful in 72% (13/18) of patients followed by MRI. After treatment, the healing of the nidus on CT was evaluated using different healing patterns (complete ossification, minimal nidus rest, decreased size, unchanged size or thermonecrosis). On MRI the presence of reactive changes (joint effusion, "oedema-like" changes of bone marrow and soft tissue oedema) and the delay time (between arterial and nidus enhancement) were assessed and compared before and after thermocoagulation. RESULTS: Complete ossification or a minimal nidus rest was observed on CT in 58% (16/28) of treatment successes (with > 12 months follow-up), but not in treatment failures. "Oedema-like" changes of bone marrow and/or soft tissue oedema were seen on MR in all patients before thermocoagulation and in all treatment failures. However, residual "oedema-like" changes of bone marrow were also found in 69% (9/13) of treatment successes. An increased delay time was observed in 62% (8/13) of treatment successes and in 1/5 of treatment failures. CONCLUSION: Complete, or almost complete, ossification of the treated nidus on CT correlated with successful treatment. Absence of this ossification pattern, however, did not correlate with treatment failure. CT could not be used to identify the activity of the nidus following treatment. The value of MR parameters to assess residual activity of the nidus was limited in this study.
Authors: Clinton H Pinto; Anthonie H M Taminiau; Geert M Vanderschueren; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Johan L Bloem; Willem R Obermann Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: P J Papagelopoulos; A F Mavrogenis; C K Kyriakopoulos; I S Benetos; N L Kelekis; J Andreou; P N Soucacos Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2006 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.671
Authors: Patrick T Liu; F Spencer Chivers; Catherine C Roberts; Christopher J Schultz; Christopher P Beauchamp Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: D I Rosenthal; F J Hornicek; M W Wolfe; L C Jennings; M C Gebhardt; H J Mankin Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Majid Maybody; Mohamed M Soliman; Sinchun Hwang; Adrian Gonzalez-Aguirre; Ernesto G Santos Martin; Elena Kaye; Meier Hsu; Chaya Moskowitz; John H Healey; Nicola Fabbri Journal: SN Compr Clin Med Date: 2020-09-14
Authors: Anurag Chahal; Prathiba Rajalakshmi; Shah A Khan; Shishir Rastogi; Deep N Srivastava; Shivanand Gamanagatti Journal: Indian J Radiol Imaging Date: 2017 Apr-Jun