Literature DB >> 17492359

Streamwater acid-base chemistry and critical loads of atmospheric sulfur deposition in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia.

T J Sullivan1, B J Cosby, J R Webb, R L Dennis, A J Bulger, F A Deviney.   

Abstract

A modeling study was conducted to evaluate the acid-base chemistry of streams within Shenandoah National Park, Virginia and to project future responses to sulfur (S) and nitrogen (N) atmospheric emissions controls. Many of the major stream systems in the park have acid neutralizing capacity (ANC) less than 20 microeq/L, levels at which chronic and/or episodic adverse impacts on native brook trout are possible. Model hindcasts suggested that none of these streams had ANC less than 50 microeq/L in 1900. Model projections, based on atmospheric emissions controls representative of laws already enacted as of 2003, suggested that the ANC of those streams simulated to have experienced the largest historical decreases in ANC will increase in the future. The levels of S deposition that were simulated to cause streamwater ANC to increase or decrease to three specified critical levels (0, 20, and 50 microeq/L) ranged from less than zero (ANC level not attainable) to several hundred kg/ha/year, depending on the selected site and its inherent acid-sensitivity, selected ANC endpoint criterion, and evaluation year for which the critical load was calculated. Several of the modeled streams situated on siliciclastic geology exhibited critical loads <0 kg/ha/year to achieve ANC >50 microeq/L in the year 2040, probably due at least in part to base cation losses from watershed soil. The median modeled siliciclastic stream had a calculated critical load to achieve ANC >50 microeq/L in 2100 that was about 3 kg/ha/year, or 77% lower than deposition in 1990, representing the time of model calibration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17492359     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9731-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  6 in total

1.  Will reduced sulphur emissions under the Second Sulphur Protocol lead to recovery of acid sensitive sites in UK?

Authors:  A Jenkins; R C Helliwell; P J Swingewood; C Sefton; M Renshaw; R C Ferrier
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  An introduction to critical loads.

Authors:  K R Bull
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Use of historical assessment for evaluation of process-based model projections of future environmental change: Lake acidification in the Adirondack mountains, New York, USA.

Authors:  T J Sullivan; R S Turner; D F Charles; B F Cumming; J P Smol; C L Schofield; C T Driscoll; B J Cosby; H J Birks; A J Uutala; J C Kingston; S S Dixit; J A Bernert; P F Ryan; D R Marmorek
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Time scales of catchment acidification. A quantitative model for estimating freshwater acidification.

Authors:  B J Cosby; G M Hornberger; J N Galloway; R E Wright
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1985-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Modelling the effect of climate change on recovery of acidified freshwaters: relative sensitivity of individual processes in the MAGIC model.

Authors:  R F Wright; J Aherne; K Bishop; L Camarero; B J Cosby; M Erlandsson; C D Evans; M Forsius; D W Hardekopf; R Helliwell; J Hruska; A Jenkins; J Kopácek; F Moldan; M Posch; M Rogora
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Factors Controlling Nitrogen Cycling and Nitrogen Saturation in Northern Temperate Forest Ecosystems.

Authors:  John D Aber; Jerry M Melillo; Knute J Nadelhoffer; John Pastor; Richard D Boone
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.657

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.