Literature DB >> 17490918

Rationale, design, and methods for the risk evaluation and communication health outcomes and utilization trial (REACH OUT).

Joshua S Benner1, Spencer B Cherry, Leif Erhardt, Michèle Fernandes, Martina Flammer, Zbigniew Gaciong, Xavier Girerd, Eric S Johnson, Juan García-Puig, Miriam C J M Sturkenboom, William Sun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the primary study hypothesis that a physician-delivered coronary heart disease risk evaluation and communication program can lower patients' predicted 10-year risk of myocardial infarction or death due to coronary heart disease by 10% within 6 months compared to usual care.
DESIGN: Prospective, parallel group, open-label, controlled, cluster-randomized multinational trial; the study site is the unit of randomization.
SETTING: Patients were recruited from 106 general practices located in nine European countries. PATIENTS: Men and women aged 45 to 64 (N=1500) with a documented history of hypertension (treated or untreated), systolic blood pressure > or =140 mmHg (or > or =130 mmHg in the presence of renal or kidney disease), no history of cardiovascular disease, and a predicted 10-year risk of myocardial infarction or death due to coronary heart disease > or =10%. INTERVENTION: Sites were randomized to deliver a physician-directed coronary heart disease risk communication and education program or usual care. The intervention program included informing patients of their 10-year risk of myocardial infarction or death due to coronary heart disease, educating patients about modifiable risk factors and their control, and three follow-up phone calls by a physician or study nurse. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Predicted 10-year risk of myocardial infarction or death due to coronary heart disease at 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: REACH OUT will evaluate a novel, patient-focused, physician-implemented application of coronary heart disease risk equations. Results of the study will be of practical relevance to physicians, health care organizations, and those who issue clinical guidelines for the reduction of cardiovascular risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17490918     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  8 in total

Review 1.  Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.

Authors:  Richard Baker; Janette Camosso-Stefinovic; Clare Gillies; Elizabeth J Shaw; Francine Cheater; Signe Flottorp; Noelle Robertson; Michel Wensing; Michelle Fiander; Martin P Eccles; Maciek Godycki-Cwirko; Jan van Lieshout; Cornelia Jäger
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-29

Review 2.  Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Richard Baker; Janette Camosso-Stefinovic; Clare Gillies; Elizabeth J Shaw; Francine Cheater; Signe Flottorp; Noelle Robertson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-03-17

Review 3.  Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Kunal N Karmali; Stephen D Persell; Pablo Perel; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Mark A Berendsen; Mark D Huffman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-14

Review 4.  Risk assessment in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in low-resource settings.

Authors:  Sandra N Ofori; Osaretin J Odia
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-08-29

5.  The @RISK Study: Risk communication for patients with type 2 diabetes: design of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Laura M C Welschen; Sandra D M Bot; Jacqueline M Dekker; Daniëlle R M Timmermans; Trudy van der Weijden; Giel Nijpels
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Using clinical prediction models to personalise lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular disease prevention: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Anke Bruninx; Bart Scheenstra; Andre Dekker; Jos Maessen; Arnoud van 't Hof; Bas Kietselaer; Iñigo Bermejo
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-12-16

7.  A novel programme to evaluate and communicate 10-year risk of CHD reduces predicted risk and improves patients' modifiable risk factor profile.

Authors:  J S Benner; L Erhardt; M Flammer; R A Moller; N Rajicic; K Changela; C Yunis; S B Cherry; Z Gaciong; E S Johnson; M C J M Sturkenboom; J García-Puig; X Girerd
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Eric Crespo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.