Literature DB >> 17489695

Economic evaluation of interactive teledermatology compared with conventional care.

April W Armstrong1, David J Dorer, Nancy E Lugn, Joseph C Kvedar.   

Abstract

Teledermatology offers a means of providing specialist care to underserved patients. The objectives of this study were to compare the costs of interactive teledermatology with conventional care, and to evaluate from a healthcare provider perspective whether interactive teledermatology is economically viable in the northeastern region of the United States. We studied the interactive teledermatology practice at Nantucket Cottage Hospital on Nantucket Island and the ambulatory clinics at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. The cost-minimization analysis compared the costs of an interactive teledermatology practice with that of a face-to-face dermatology clinic. One-way sensitivity analyses examined the effect of varying the costs of technology, physician compensation, or clinic space on the overall cost of interactive teledermatology. We also assessed the economic viability of the interactive teledermatology practice by comparing the operating costs with reimbursements. The total hourly operating costs for the interactive teledermatology practice on Nantucket Island and the face-to-face clinic in Boston were $274 and $346, respectively. Three separate one-way sensitivity analyses showed that, for the cost of the teledermatology practice to equal that of the conventional clinic, the cost of teledermatology technology could increase by 9.3-fold, dermatologists working at the teledermatology practice could be compensated up to $197 an hour, or the cost of teledermatology clinic space could reach $57 an hour. Our analysis also showed that the hourly reimbursement for the teledermatology practice was $487, which exceeded its hourly operating cost of $274. The cost of operating an interactive teledermatology practice in a remote region may be less than that of a conventional clinic in a nearby urban center in the northeastern area of the United States. From a healthcare provider perspective, interactive teledermatology can be an economically viable means of providing dermatological care to remote regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17489695     DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2006.0035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  18 in total

Review 1.  The Empirical Foundations of Teledermatology: A Review of the Research Evidence.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Gary W Shannon; Trilokraj Tejasvi; Joseph C Kvedar; Michael Gates
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Mobile teledermatology for a prompter and more efficient dermatological care in rural Mongolia.

Authors:  K Byamba; S Syed-Abdul; M García-Romero; C-W Huang; S Nergyi; A Nyamdorj; P-A Nguyen; U Iqbal; K Paik; L Celi; V Nikore; M Somai; W-S Jian; Y-C Li
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 9.302

3.  Teledermatology: its role in dermatosurgery.

Authors:  Garehatty Rudrappa Kanthraj
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-07

Review 4.  The empirical foundations of telemedicine interventions for chronic disease management.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Gary W Shannon; Brian R Smith; Dale C Alverson; Nina Antoniotti; William G Barsan; Noura Bashshur; Edward M Brown; Molly J Coye; Charles R Doarn; Stewart Ferguson; Jim Grigsby; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Joseph C Kvedar; Jonathan Linkous; Ronald C Merrell; Thomas Nesbitt; Ronald Poropatich; Karen S Rheuban; Jay H Sanders; Andrew R Watson; Ronald S Weinstein; Peter Yellowlees
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 5.  A cost minimisation analysis in teledermatology: model-based approach.

Authors:  Nina Eminović; Marcel G Dijkgraaf; Rosanne M Berghout; Astrid H Prins; Patrick Je Bindels; Nicolette F de Keizer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Practice models and challenges in teledermatology: a study of collective experiences from teledermatologists.

Authors:  April W Armstrong; Mei W Kwong; Lynda Ledo; Thomas S Nesbitt; Sandra L Shewry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Teledermatology for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.

Authors:  Naomi Chuchu; Jacqueline Dinnes; Yemisi Takwoingi; Rubeta N Matin; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport; Jacqueline F Moreau; Oliver Bassett; Kathie Godfrey; Colette O'Sullivan; Fiona M Walter; Richard Motley; Jonathan J Deeks; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

8.  Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care direct-care teledermatology program.

Authors:  Akhilesh S Pathipati; Justin M Ko
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2016-07-12

9.  Online Care Versus In-Person Care for Improving Quality of Life in Psoriasis: A Randomized Controlled Equivalency Trial.

Authors:  April W Armstrong; Adam R Ford; Cindy J Chambers; Emanual Maverakis; Cory A Dunnick; Mary-Margaret Chren; Joel M Gelfand; Caitlin M Gibbons; Brittany M Gibbons; Christianne J Lane
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 8.551

10.  Telemedicine service use: a new metric.

Authors:  Maurice Mars; Richard Scott
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.