Literature DB >> 17489285

The effect of context variability on source memory.

Richard L Marsh1, Gabriel I Cook, Jason L Hicks.   

Abstract

High-context-variability (HCV) items are experienced in many more preexperimental semantic contexts than are low-context-variability (LCV) items. LCV confers an advantage to recognition memory (Steyvers & Malmberg, 2003). In the present study, we tested whether or not that advantage could be causedby enhanced source memory. Both context variability and word frequency were manipulated, and both factors generally affected source monitoring. Accuracy was better for LCV items than for HCV items and better for low- than for high-word-frequency items. We also considered whether context variability exerts its influence at encoding or at retrieval. We concluded that better recognition memory for LCV items was due, in part, to better retrieval of contextual details that specify how an item was originally studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17489285     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  24 in total

1.  Context-dependent recognition memory: the ICE theory.

Authors:  K Murnane; M P Phelps; K Malmberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-12

2.  An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory.

Authors:  S D Slotnick; S A Klein; C S Dodson; A P Shimamura
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Memory for multidimensional source information.

Authors:  Thorsten Meiser; Arndt Bröder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: comment on Yonelinas (1999).

Authors:  J Qin; C L Raye; M K Johnson; K J Mitchell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Remember-know judgments can depend on how memory is tested.

Authors:  J L Hicks; R L Marsh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

6.  The role of recollection and familiarity in the context variability mirror effect.

Authors:  Gabriel I Cook; Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

7.  Feature binding, attention and object perception.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing.

Authors:  J M Gardiner; C Ramponi; A Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1998-03

Review 10.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  5 in total

1.  Overdistribution in source memory.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; V F Reyna; R E Holliday; K Nakamura
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Word-context associations in episodic memory are learned at the conceptual level: Word frequency, bilingual proficiency, and bilingual status effects on source memory.

Authors:  Wendy S Francis; E Natalia Strobach; Renee M Penalver; Michelle Martínez; Bianca V Gurrola; Amaris Soltero
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Examining the role of context variability in memory for items and associations.

Authors:  William R Aue; Jessica M Fontaine; Amy H Criss
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08

4.  Negative effects of item repetition on source memory.

Authors:  Kyungmi Kim; Do-Joon Yi; Carol L Raye; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-08

5.  Where is the forgetting with list-method directed forgetting in recognition?

Authors:  Lili Sahakyan; Emily R Waldum; Aaron S Benjamin; Samuel P Bickett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.