Literature DB >> 17489264

Reptile and arboreal marsupial response to replanted vegetation in agricultural landscapes.

Ross B Cunningham1, David B Lindenmayer, Mason Crane, Damian Michael, Christopher MacGregor.   

Abstract

We report reptile and arboreal marsupial responses to vegetation planting and remnant native vegetation in agricultural landscapes in southeastern Australia. We used a hierarchical survey to select 23 landscapes that varied in the amounts of remnant native vegetation and planted native vegetation. We selected two farms within each landscape. In landscapes with plantings, we selected one farm with and one farm without plantings. We surveyed arboreal marsupials and reptiles on four sites on each farm that encompassed four vegetation types (plantings 7-20 years old, old-growth woodland, naturally occurring seedling regrowth woodland, and coppice [i.e., multistemmed] regrowth woodland). Reptiles and arboreal marsupials were less likely to occur on farms and in landscapes with comparatively large areas of plantings. Such farms and landscapes had less native vegetation, fewer paddock trees, and less woody debris within those areas of natural vegetation. The relatively large area of planting on these farms was insufficient to overcome the lack of these key structural attributes. Old-growth woodland, coppice regrowth, seedling regrowth, and planted areas had different habitat values for different reptiles and arboreal marsupials. We conclude that, although plantings may improve habitat conditions for some taxa, they may not effectively offset the negative effects of native vegetation clearing for all species, especially those reliant on old-growth woodland. Restoring suitable habitat for such species may take decades to centuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17489264     DOI: 10.1890/05-1892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  11 in total

1.  Avian functional responses to landscape recovery.

Authors:  Karen Ikin; Philip S Barton; Wade Blanchard; Mason Crane; John Stein; David B Lindenmayer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Revegetation and reproduction: do restoration plantings in agricultural landscapes support breeding populations of woodland birds?

Authors:  Donna J Belder; Jennifer C Pierson; Karen Ikin; David B Lindenmayer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  A novel and cost-effective monitoring approach for outcomes in an Australian biodiversity conservation incentive program.

Authors:  David B Lindenmayer; Charles Zammit; Simon J Attwood; Emma Burns; Claire L Shepherd; Geoff Kay; Jeff Wood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Not all kinds of revegetation are created equal: revegetation type influences bird assemblages in threatened Australian woodland ecosystems.

Authors:  David B Lindenmayer; Amanda R Northrop-Mackie; Rebecca Montague-Drake; Mason Crane; Damian Michael; Sachiko Okada; Philip Gibbons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Visualization of species pairwise associations: a case study of surrogacy in bird assemblages.

Authors:  Peter W Lane; David B Lindenmayer; Philip S Barton; Wade Blanchard; Martin J Westgate
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests.

Authors:  Renato Crouzeilles; Mariana S Ferreira; Robin L Chazdon; David B Lindenmayer; Jerônimo B B Sansevero; Lara Monteiro; Alvaro Iribarrem; Agnieszka E Latawiec; Bernardo B N Strassburg
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  An empirical assessment and comparison of species-based and habitat-based surrogates: a case study of forest vertebrates and large old trees.

Authors:  David B Lindenmayer; Philip S Barton; Peter W Lane; Martin J Westgate; Lachlan McBurney; David Blair; Philip Gibbons; Gene E Likens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Multi-scale associations between vegetation cover and woodland bird communities across a large agricultural region.

Authors:  Karen Ikin; Philip S Barton; Ingrid A Stirnemann; John R Stein; Damian Michael; Mason Crane; Sachiko Okada; David B Lindenmayer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  The value of countryside elements in the conservation of a threatened arboreal marsupial Petaurus norfolcensis in agricultural landscapes of south-eastern Australia--the disproportional value of scattered trees.

Authors:  Mason J Crane; David B Lindenmayer; Ross B Cunningham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  At the Crossroads: Does the Configuration of Roadside Vegetation Affect Woodland Bird Communities in Rural Landscapes?

Authors:  Mark Hall; Dale Nimmo; Andrew F Bennett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.