Literature DB >> 17489260

Conservation priorities for mammals in megadiverse Mexico: the efficiency of reserve networks.

Gerardo Ceballos1.   

Abstract

A major goal of conservation biologists is to identify critical areas for the conservation of biological diversity and then strategically include them in an efficient system of reserves. In general, however, reserve networks have been selected for different objectives, and most countries lack an evaluation of their reserves' ability to represent a percentage of the national diversity. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of a network of reserves to represent the species of mammals in Mexico. The focus of the analyses is on species and site level, evaluating the representation of all terrestrial mammals in the 30 most important reserves. The representation of all species, endemic species, endangered species, and species with restricted distributions in the reserves was assessed and compared. Endemic or endangered species with restricted distributions were expected to be less represented in reserves than were widespread species. The most important reserves for the conservation of mammals were determined with the use of complementarity analyses. Priority sites for the representation of all the species currently absent from the reserve network were then selected. The results have broad applications for conservation. First, 82% of the mammal species from Mexico were represented in the reserve network, which covers a small portion (3.8%) of the country. Second, this percentage is certainly larger as several reserves were not evaluated due to a lack of data. A priority for a national conservation strategy could be to conduct biological surveys in those reserves lacking inventories to evaluate their contribution to conservation. Third, in spite of its demonstrated value, Mexico's reserve network can be improved by designating complementary areas. Additional priority sites, where reserves are required to represent most gap species in the network, were identified. Finally, it is clear that this reserve network has limitations for maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services at regional scales. A comprehensive conservation strategy has, therefore, to incorporate mechanisms that enhance the value of human-dominated landscapes for the maintenance of biodiversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17489260     DOI: 10.1890/06-0134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  5 in total

1.  Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes.

Authors:  Richard A Fuller; Eve McDonald-Madden; Kerrie A Wilson; Josie Carwardine; Hedley S Grantham; James E M Watson; Carissa J Klein; David C Green; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Effectiveness of protected areas for representing species and populations of terrestrial mammals in Costa Rica.

Authors:  José F González-Maya; Luis R Víquez-R; Jerrold L Belant; Gerardo Ceballos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Distribution of mammal functional diversity in the Neotropical realm: Influence of land-use and extinction risk.

Authors:  José F González-Maya; Enrique Martínez-Meyer; Rodrigo Medellín; Gerardo Ceballos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Biogeography of terrestrial vertebrates and its conservation implications in a transitional region in western Mexico.

Authors:  Andrés García; José F González-Maya; Gerardo Ceballos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Complementarity and Area-Efficiency in the Prioritization of the Global Protected Area Network.

Authors:  Peter Kullberg; Tuuli Toivonen; Federico Montesino Pouzols; Joona Lehtomäki; Enrico Di Minin; Atte Moilanen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.