Literature DB >> 17489244

Chinook salmon use of spawning patches: relative roles of habitat quality, size, and connectivity.

Daniel J Isaak1, Russell F Thurow, Bruce E Rieman, Jason B Dunham.   

Abstract

Declines in many native fish populations have led to reassessments of management goals and shifted priorities from consumptive uses to species preservation. As management has shifted, relevant environmental characteristics have evolved from traditional metrics that described local habitat quality to characterizations of habitat size and connectivity. Despite the implications this shift has for how habitats may be prioritized for conservation, it has been rare to assess the relative importance of these habitat components. We used an information-theoretic approach to select the best models from sets of logistic regressions that linked habitat quality, size, and connectivity to the occurrence of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) nests. Spawning distributions were censused annually from 1995 to 2004, and data were complemented with field measurements that described habitat quality in 43 suitable spawning patches across a stream network that drained 1150 km2 in central Idaho. Results indicated that the most plausible models were dominated by measures of habitat size and connectivity, whereas habitat quality was of minor importance. Connectivity was the strongest predictor of nest occurrence, but connectivity interacted with habitat size, which became relatively more important when populations were reduced. Comparison of observed nest distributions to null model predictions confirmed that the habitat size association was driven by a biological mechanism when populations were small, but this association may have been an area-related sampling artifact at higher abundances. The implications for habitat management are that the size and connectivity of existing habitat networks should be maintained whenever possible. In situations where habitat restoration is occurring, expansion of existing areas or creation of new habitats in key areas that increase connectivity may be beneficial. Information about habitat size and connectivity also could be used to strategically prioritize areas for improvement of local habitat quality, with areas not meeting minimum thresholds being deemed inappropriate for pursuit of restoration activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17489244     DOI: 10.1890/05-1949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  6 in total

1.  Some (Fish Might) Like It Hot: Habitat Quality and Fish Growth from Past to Future Climates.

Authors:  William Jeff Reeder; Frank Gariglio; Ryan Carnie; Chunling Tang; Daniel Isaak; Qiuwen Chen; Zhongbo Yu; James A McKean; Daniele Tonina
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 10.753

2.  Potential factors affecting survival differ by run-timing and location: linear mixed-effects models of Pacific salmonids (Oncorhynchus spp.) in the Klamath River, California.

Authors:  Rebecca M Quiñones; Marcel Holyoak; Michael L Johnson; Peter B Moyle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Size, connectivity and edge effects of stream habitats explain spatio-temporal variation in brown trout (Salmo trutta) density.

Authors:  Carl Tamario; Erik Degerman; Daniela Polic; Petter Tibblin; Anders Forsman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Spatial ecological processes and local factors predict the distribution and abundance of spawning by steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) across a complex riverscape.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Falke; Jason B Dunham; Christopher E Jordan; Kristina M McNyset; Gordon H Reeves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Asymmetric dispersal structures a riverine metapopulation of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera laevis.

Authors:  Akira Terui; Yusuke Miyazaki; Akira Yoshioka; Kenzo Kaifu; Shin-Ichiro S Matsuzaki; Izumi Washitani
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 6.  Old concepts, new challenges: adapting landscape-scale conservation to the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Lynda Donaldson; Robert J Wilson; Ilya M D Maclean
Journal:  Biodivers Conserv       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.549

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.