Literature DB >> 17488782

Pharmacokinetic profiles up to 12 h after administration of vaginal, sublingual and slow-release oral misoprostol.

A Aronsson1, C Fiala, O Stephansson, F Granath, B Watzer, H Schweer, K Gemzell-Danielsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that the route of administration of misoprostol has a strong impact on the pharmacokinetic profile and result in different clinical efficacy. No study has so far evaluated the pharmacokinetics beyond 6 hours. Furthermore a new slow-release misoprostol formulation was included in the study.
METHODS: Pharmacokinetics of a novel slow-release (SR) oral misoprostol was compared during 12 h after administration to conventional misoprostol administered vaginally or sublingually. Thirty-three women requesting surgical abortion up to 12 weeks were randomly allocated to groups receiving a single dose of 400 microg conventional misoprostol administered vaginally or sublingually or 800 microg SR oral misoprostol. Blood samples were taken before (0 h) and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h after misoprostol administration. Misoprostol acid (MPA) was determined in serum samples using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.
RESULTS: Three women did not complete the study. Serum concentrations reached their highest level following sublingual misoprostol (P<0.0001) and the time to peak concentration was shortest for this group (P=0.0094). The area under the curve (AUC) up to 12 h was greater following sublingual treatment than for the other alternatives (P<0.0001) and lowest for SR misoprostol. Cumulative serum levels of MPA did not increase beyond 6 h following sublingual and vaginal administration, while they continued to increase up to 12 h following SR misoprostol.
CONCLUSIONS: The new SR form of misoprostol demonstrated lower peak levels and a lower AUC but longer lasting elevation in serum levels when compared to conventional misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally. SR misoprostol may offer an alternative to repeated administration of conventional misoprostol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17488782     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  4 in total

1.  Abortion after deliberate Arthrotec® addition to food. Mass spectrometric detection of diclofenac, misoprostol acid, and their urinary metabolites.

Authors:  Bernhard Watzer; Klaas J Lusthof; Horst Schweer
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term.

Authors:  Yana Vorontsova; David M Haas; Kathleen Flannery; Andrea R Masters; Larissa L Silva; Rebecca C Pierson; Brittany Yeley; Graham Hogg; David Guise; Michael Heathman; Sara K Quinney
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-06-12       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 3.  Forensic Toxicological Aspects of Misoprostol Use in Pharmacological Abortions.

Authors:  Paweł Szpot; Olga Wachełko; Marcin Zawadzki
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  A randomized controlled trial of misoprostol and sulprostone to end pregnancy after fetal death.

Authors:  Kristin Van Mensel; Filip Claerhout; Patrick Debois; Marc J N C Keirse; Myriam Hanssens
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009-09-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.