OBJECTIVES: To assess mechanisms of myocardial perfusion impairment in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS: Fourteen patients with obstructive HCM (mean (SD) age 53 (10) years, 11 men) underwent intravenous adenosine myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), positron emission tomography (PET) and cardiac catheterisation. Fourteen healthy volunteers (mean age 31 (4) years, 11 men) served as controls. Relative myocardial blood volume (rBV), exchange flow velocity (beta), myocardial blood flow (MBF), MBF reserve (MFR) and endocardial-to-subepicardial (endo-to-epi) MBF ratio were measured from the steady state and contrast replenishment time-intensity curves. RESULTS: Patients with HCM had lower rest MBF (for LVRPP-corrected)--mean (SD) (0.92 (0.12) vs 1.13 (0.25) ml/min/g, p<0.01)--and hyperaemic MBF--(2.56 (0.49) vs 4.34 (0.78) ml/min/g, p<0.01) than controls. Resting rBV was lower in patients with HCM (0.094 (0.016) vs 0.138 (0.014) ml/ml), and during hyperaemia (0.104 (0.018) ml/ml vs 0.185 (0.024) ml/ml) (all p<0.001) than in controls. beta tended to be higher in HCM at rest (9.4 (4.6) vs 7.7 (4.2) ml/min) and during hyperaemia (25.8 (6.4) vs 23.1 (6.2) ml/min) than in controls. Septal endo-to-epi MBF decreased during hyperaemia (0.86 (0.15) to 0.64 (0.18), p<0.01). rBV was inversely correlated with left ventricular (LV) mass index (p<0.05). Both hyperaemic and endo-to-epi MBF were inversely correlated with LV end-diastolic pressure, LV mass index, and LV outflow tract pressure gradient (all p<0.05). MCE-derived MBF correlated well with PET at rest (r = 0.84) and hyperaemia (r = 0.87) (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HCM, LV end-diastolic pressure, LV outflow tract pressure gradient, and LV mass index are independent predictors of rBV and hyperaemic MBF.
OBJECTIVES: To assess mechanisms of myocardial perfusion impairment in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS: Fourteen patients with obstructive HCM (mean (SD) age 53 (10) years, 11 men) underwent intravenous adenosine myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), positron emission tomography (PET) and cardiac catheterisation. Fourteen healthy volunteers (mean age 31 (4) years, 11 men) served as controls. Relative myocardial blood volume (rBV), exchange flow velocity (beta), myocardial blood flow (MBF), MBF reserve (MFR) and endocardial-to-subepicardial (endo-to-epi) MBF ratio were measured from the steady state and contrast replenishment time-intensity curves. RESULTS:Patients with HCM had lower rest MBF (for LVRPP-corrected)--mean (SD) (0.92 (0.12) vs 1.13 (0.25) ml/min/g, p<0.01)--and hyperaemic MBF--(2.56 (0.49) vs 4.34 (0.78) ml/min/g, p<0.01) than controls. Resting rBV was lower in patients with HCM (0.094 (0.016) vs 0.138 (0.014) ml/ml), and during hyperaemia (0.104 (0.018) ml/ml vs 0.185 (0.024) ml/ml) (all p<0.001) than in controls. beta tended to be higher in HCM at rest (9.4 (4.6) vs 7.7 (4.2) ml/min) and during hyperaemia (25.8 (6.4) vs 23.1 (6.2) ml/min) than in controls. Septal endo-to-epi MBF decreased during hyperaemia (0.86 (0.15) to 0.64 (0.18), p<0.01). rBV was inversely correlated with left ventricular (LV) mass index (p<0.05). Both hyperaemic and endo-to-epi MBF were inversely correlated with LV end-diastolic pressure, LV mass index, and LV outflow tract pressure gradient (all p<0.05). MCE-derived MBF correlated well with PET at rest (r = 0.84) and hyperaemia (r = 0.87) (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HCM, LV end-diastolic pressure, LV outflow tract pressure gradient, and LV mass index are independent predictors of rBV and hyperaemic MBF.
Authors: Pieter A Dijkmans; Paul Knaapen; Gertjan T J Sieswerda; Eric Aiazian; Cees A Visser; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Frans C Visser; Otto Kamp Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: R Krams; M J Kofflard; D J Duncker; C Von Birgelen; S Carlier; M Kliffen; F J ten Cate; P W Serruys Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-01-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1989 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Paco E Bravo; Hong-Chang Luo; Iraklis Pozios; Stefan L Zimmerman; Celia Pamela Corona-Villalobos; Lars Sorensen; Ihab R Kamel; David A Bluemke; Richard L Wahl; M Roselle Abraham; Theodore P Abraham Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-06-14 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Paco E Bravo; Stefan L Zimmerman; Hong-Chang Luo; Iraklis Pozios; Mahadevan Rajaram; Aurélio Pinheiro; Charles Steenbergen; Ihab R Kamel; Richard L Wahl; David A Bluemke; Frank M Bengel; M Roselle Abraham; Theodore P Abraham Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-02-15 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Attila Nemes; Erika Balázs; Osama I I Soliman; Róbert Sepp; Miklós Csanády; Tamás Forster Journal: Heart Vessels Date: 2009-09-27 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Paola Roldan; Sriram Ravi; James Hodovan; J Todd Belcik; Stephen B Heitner; Ahmad Masri; Jonathan R Lindner Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2022-09-19 Impact factor: 2.263