Wendy Hu1, Carol Grbich, Andrew Kemp. 1. Department of Allergy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Locked Bag 4001, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia. wendyhu@med.usyd.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine information needs and preferences of parents regarding food allergy. DESIGN: Qualitative study including in-depth semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the constant comparative method, aided by participant checking of interview summaries, independent reviewers and qualitative analysis software. PARTICIPANTS: 84 parents of children with food allergy. SETTING: Three paediatric allergy clinics and a national consumer organisation. RESULTS: Most parent participants had received third level education (72%) and 39% had occupational backgrounds in health and education. Parents experienced different phases in their need for information: at diagnosis when there is an intense desire for information, at follow-up when there is continuing uncertainty about allergy severity and appropriate management, and at new events and milestones. They preferred information to be provided in a variety of formats, with access to reliable individualised advice between clinic appointments, within the context of an ongoing relationship with a health professional. Parents wished to know the reasoning behind doctor's opinions and identified areas of core information content, including unaddressed topics such as what to feed their child rather than what to avoid. Suboptimal information provision was cited by parents as a key reason for seeking second opinions. CONCLUSION: Parents with children with food allergies have unmet information needs. Study findings may assist in the design and implementation of targeted educational strategies which better meet parental needs and preferences.
OBJECTIVE: To examine information needs and preferences of parents regarding food allergy. DESIGN: Qualitative study including in-depth semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the constant comparative method, aided by participant checking of interview summaries, independent reviewers and qualitative analysis software. PARTICIPANTS: 84 parents of children with food allergy. SETTING: Three paediatric allergy clinics and a national consumer organisation. RESULTS: Most parent participants had received third level education (72%) and 39% had occupational backgrounds in health and education. Parents experienced different phases in their need for information: at diagnosis when there is an intense desire for information, at follow-up when there is continuing uncertainty about allergy severity and appropriate management, and at new events and milestones. They preferred information to be provided in a variety of formats, with access to reliable individualised advice between clinic appointments, within the context of an ongoing relationship with a health professional. Parents wished to know the reasoning behind doctor's opinions and identified areas of core information content, including unaddressed topics such as what to feed their child rather than what to avoid. Suboptimal information provision was cited by parents as a key reason for seeking second opinions. CONCLUSION: Parents with children with food allergies have unmet information needs. Study findings may assist in the design and implementation of targeted educational strategies which better meet parental needs and preferences.
Authors: Brynn K Wainstein; Katy Sterling-Levis; Sally A Baker; Jonathan Taitz; Michael Brydon Journal: J Paediatr Child Health Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 1.954
Authors: G Pouessel; A Deschildre; C Castelain; A Sardet; S Sagot-Bevenot; A de Sauve-Boeuf; C Thumerelle; C Santos Journal: Pediatr Allergy Immunol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 6.377
Authors: John O Warner; Michael A Kaliner; Carlos D Crisci; Sergio Del Giacco; Anthony J Frew; G H Liu; Jorge Maspero; Hee-Bom Moon; Takemasa Nakagawa; Paul C Potter; Lanny J Rosenwasser; Anand B Singh; Erkka Valovirta; Paul Van Cauwenberge Journal: Int Arch Allergy Immunol Date: 2005-12-23 Impact factor: 2.749
Authors: Daniel R Longo; Shari L Schubert; Barbara A Wright; Joseph LeMaster; Casey D Williams; John N Clore Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Perla A Vargas; Scott H Sicherer; Lynn Christie; Maureen Keaveny; Sally Noone; Debra Watkins; Suzanna K Carlisle; Stacie M Jones Journal: Pediatr Allergy Immunol Date: 2011-02-20 Impact factor: 6.377
Authors: Jennifer S LeBovidge; Linda J Herbert; Ashley Ramos; Nancy Rotter; Scott H Sicherer; Michael C Young; Michael Pistiner; Wanda Phipatanakul; Lisa M Bartnikas; Theresa A Bingemann Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2022-08-25
Authors: Ruchi S Gupta; Jennifer S Kim; Julia A Barnathan; Laura B Amsden; Lakshmi S Tummala; Jane L Holl Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2008-09-19 Impact factor: 2.125