OBJECTIVE: Common bile duct (CBD) brushings have been recognized as a technique of moderate sensitivity and high specificity in identifying carcinoma of the ampulla and pancreatico-biliary regions. This study evaluated the increase in sensitivity of this technique using the ThinPrep technique of specimen preparation when compared with conventional cytology smears. METHODS: A total of 113 bile duct brushings were included in the study (38 conventional smears and 75 slides prepared using the ThinPrep technique). All slides were reviewed by one cytologist. Five categories of reporting were used: inadequate, negative, atypia, suspicious and malignant. RESULTS: The inadequate category of reporting disappeared in the ThinPrep group with improved specimen fixation and preparation and hence reduced artefact. Sensitivity of diagnosis of malignancy increased from 39% in conventional smears to 53% in the ThinPrep group. Specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy were 100%, 100%, 60% and 68% for conventional smears and were 100%, 100%, 60% and 72%, respectively, for ThinPrep specimens. CONCLUSIONS: ThinPrep technique was associated with increased sensitivity of diagnosis, in part due to improved specimen fixation and reduced artefact. Cytology of bile duct brushings is an important diagnostic tool for sites from which it can be difficult to obtain a histology biopsy. It may therefore provide the only opportunity for tissue diagnosis of carcinoma from these sites, hence the importance of optimizing sensitivity.
OBJECTIVE: Common bile duct (CBD) brushings have been recognized as a technique of moderate sensitivity and high specificity in identifying carcinoma of the ampulla and pancreatico-biliary regions. This study evaluated the increase in sensitivity of this technique using the ThinPrep technique of specimen preparation when compared with conventional cytology smears. METHODS: A total of 113 bile duct brushings were included in the study (38 conventional smears and 75 slides prepared using the ThinPrep technique). All slides were reviewed by one cytologist. Five categories of reporting were used: inadequate, negative, atypia, suspicious and malignant. RESULTS: The inadequate category of reporting disappeared in the ThinPrep group with improved specimen fixation and preparation and hence reduced artefact. Sensitivity of diagnosis of malignancy increased from 39% in conventional smears to 53% in the ThinPrep group. Specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy were 100%, 100%, 60% and 68% for conventional smears and were 100%, 100%, 60% and 72%, respectively, for ThinPrep specimens. CONCLUSIONS: ThinPrep technique was associated with increased sensitivity of diagnosis, in part due to improved specimen fixation and reduced artefact. Cytology of bile duct brushings is an important diagnostic tool for sites from which it can be difficult to obtain a histology biopsy. It may therefore provide the only opportunity for tissue diagnosis of carcinoma from these sites, hence the importance of optimizing sensitivity.