Literature DB >> 17488022

Starch with a slow digestion property produced by altering its chain length, branch density, and crystalline structure.

Zihua Ao1, Senay Simsek, Genyi Zhang, Mahesh Venkatachalam, Bradley L Reuhs, Bruce R Hamaker.   

Abstract

The hypothesis of increasing the branch density of starch to reduce its digestion rate through partial shortening of amylopectin exterior chains and the length of amylose was investigated. Starch products prepared using beta-amylase, beta-amylase and transglucosidase, maltogenic alpha-amylase, and maltogenic alpha-amylase and transglucosidase showed significant reduction of rapidly digested starch by 14.5%, 29.0%, 19.8%, and 31.0% with a concomitant increase of slowly digested starch by 9.0%, 19.7%, 5.7%, and 11.0%, respectively. The resistant starch content increased from 5.1% to 13.5% in treated starches. The total contents of the prebiotics isomaltose, isomaltotriose, and panose (Isomaltooligosaccharides) were 2.3% and 5.5%, respectively, for beta-amylase/transglucosidase- and maltogenic alpha-amylase/transglucosidase-treated starches. The molecular weight distribution of enzyme-treated starches and their debranched chain length distributions, analyzed using high-performance size-exclusion chromatography with multiangle laser light scattering and refractive index detection (HPSEC-MALLS-RI) and HPSEC-RI, showed distinctly different patterns among starches with different enzyme treatments. A larger proportion of low molecular weight fractions appeared in starches treated additionally with transglucosidase. All enzyme-treated starches showed a mixture of B- and V-type X-ray diffraction patterns, and 1H NMR spectra showed a significant increase of alpha-1,6 linkages. Both the increase of the starch branch density and the crystalline structure in the treated starches likely contribute to their slow digestion property.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17488022     DOI: 10.1021/jf063123x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  16 in total

Review 1.  Improving healthspan via changes in gut microbiota and fermentation.

Authors:  Michael J Keenan; Maria L Marco; Donald K Ingram; Roy J Martin
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-09-14

2.  Digestion of starch in a dynamic small intestinal model.

Authors:  M R Jaime-Fonseca; O Gouseti; P J Fryer; M S J Wickham; S Bakalis
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 3.  Properties and applications of starch modifying enzymes for use in the baking industry.

Authors:  Sung Hoon Park; Yerim Na; Jungwoo Kim; Shin Dal Kang; Kwan-Hwa Park
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.391

4.  An ATP Binding Cassette Transporter Mediates the Uptake of α-(1,6)-Linked Dietary Oligosaccharides in Bifidobacterium and Correlates with Competitive Growth on These Substrates.

Authors:  Morten Ejby; Folmer Fredslund; Joakim Mark Andersen; Andreja Vujičić Žagar; Jonas Rosager Henriksen; Thomas Lars Andersen; Birte Svensson; Dirk Jan Slotboom; Maher Abou Hachem
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Starch source influences dietary glucose generation at the mucosal α-glucosidase level.

Authors:  Amy Hui-Mei Lin; Byung-Hoo Lee; Buford L Nichols; Roberto Quezada-Calvillo; David R Rose; Hassan Y Naim; Bruce R Hamaker
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Mucosal maltase-glucoamylase plays a crucial role in starch digestion and prandial glucose homeostasis of mice.

Authors:  Buford L Nichols; Roberto Quezada-Calvillo; Claudia C Robayo-Torres; Zihua Ao; Bruce R Hamaker; Nancy F Butte; Juan Marini; Farook Jahoor; Erwin E Sterchi
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Dynamics of Streptococcus mutans transcriptome in response to starch and sucrose during biofilm development.

Authors:  Marlise I Klein; Lena DeBaz; Senyo Agidi; Herbert Lee; Gary Xie; Amy H-M Lin; Bruce R Hamaker; José A Lemos; Hyun Koo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of enzymatic treatment of different starch sources on the in vitro rate and extent of starch digestion.

Authors:  Mirosław Marek Kasprzak; Helle Nygaard Lærke; Flemming Hofmann Larsen; Knud Erik Bach Knudsen; Sven Pedersen; Anne Skov Jørgensen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  Enzyme-synthesized highly branched maltodextrins have slow glucose generation at the mucosal α-glucosidase level and are slowly digestible in vivo.

Authors:  Byung-Hoo Lee; Like Yan; Robert J Phillips; Bradley L Reuhs; Kyra Jones; David R Rose; Buford L Nichols; Roberto Quezada-Calvillo; Sang-Ho Yoo; Bruce R Hamaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Concerted suppression of all starch branching enzyme genes in barley produces amylose-only starch granules.

Authors:  Massimiliano Carciofi; Andreas Blennow; Susanne L Jensen; Shahnoor S Shaik; Anette Henriksen; Alain Buléon; Preben B Holm; Kim H Hebelstrup
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.