Literature DB >> 17487671

Children with a cochlear implant: characteristics and determinants of speech recognition, speech-recognition growth rate, and speech production.

Ona Bø Wie1, Eva-Signe Falkenberg, Ole Tvete, Bruce Tomblin.   

Abstract

The objectives of the study were to describe the characteristics of the first 79 prelingually deaf cochlear implant users in Norway and to investigate to what degree the variation in speech recognition, speech- recognition growth rate, and speech production could be explained by the characteristics of the child, the cochlear implant, the family, and the educational setting. Data gathered longitudinally were analysed using descriptive statistics, multiple regression, and growth-curve analysis. The results show that more than 50% of the variation could be explained by these characteristics. Daily user-time, non-verbal intelligence, mode of communication, length of CI experience, and educational placement had the highest effect on the outcome. The results also indicate that children educated in a bilingual approach to education have better speech perception and faster speech perception growth rate with increased focus on spoken language.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17487671     DOI: 10.1080/14992020601182891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  13 in total

1.  Vocabulary Facilitates Speech Perception in Children With Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Kelsey E Klein; Elizabeth A Walker; Benjamin Kirby; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Enhancement technology and outcomes: what professionals and researchers can learn from those skeptical about cochlear implants.

Authors:  Patrick Kermit
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2012-12

3.  Choosing for the child with cochlear implants: a note of precaution.

Authors:  Patrick Kermit
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2010-05

4.  Using Technology to Monitor Hearing Device Use and Linguistic Environments: Early Intervention Providers' Perspectives.

Authors:  Margo C Appenzeller; Sophie E Ambrose
Journal:  J Early Hear Detect Interv       Date:  2020

5.  [Long-term functional outcomes of cochlear implants in children].

Authors:  R Laszig; A Aschendorff; R Beck; C Schild; S Kröger; T Wesarg; S Arndt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Auditory Deprivation Does Not Impair Executive Function, But Language Deprivation Might: Evidence From a Parent-Report Measure in Deaf Native Signing Children.

Authors:  Matthew L Hall; Inge-Marie Eigsti; Heather Bortfeld; Diane Lillo-Martin
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2016-09-13

7.  Influence of implantation age on school-age language performance in pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Donna Thal; John K Niparko; Laurie S Eisenberg; Alexandra L Quittner; Nae-Yuh Wang
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Longitudinal speech perception and language performance in pediatric cochlear implant users: the effect of age at implantation.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Elizabeth A Walker; Jacob Oleson; Maura Kenworthy; Tanya Van Voorst; J Bruce Tomblin; Haihong Ji; Karen I Kirk; Bob McMurray; Marlan Hanson; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Communication, psychosocial, and educational outcomes of children with cochlear implants and challenges remaining for professionals and parents.

Authors:  Renée Punch; Merv B Hyde
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-05

10.  Training to improve language outcomes in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.